Friday, October 31, 2008

Happy Halloween...

Mrs. G has taken The Boy and BabyGirl G out trick-or-treating. It's weird to think that kids are out roaming the streets looking for candy when it's still light out, but that's what we get for messing with daylight savings time I guess...

In the spirit of Halloween, here's my Igor costume from the Cub Scout Halloween party:



And if that's not bad enough, an angry mustache:



Heh. Those oughta bring some interesting nightmares...

Happy Halloween everybody. Now go out and TP an Obama supporter's house...

That is all.

Friday Fun Thread: Good Foreign Cars of the 1980s

If it's Friday, it must be time for another automotive fun thread. When I started doing these "top ten" lists a while back, I wasn't clear that I was starting with American cars only, and received numerous suggestions for good, bad, or ugly cars from around the world. I had split the list into American and foreign intentionally - I could milk the subject twice as long... :)

So here's my list of the cool foreign cars of the 1980s. The list centers on cars available in the United States only, not what's available in the country of origin - hence why the Nissan Skyline is not on the list. Enjoy!




1. 1984 Ferrari Testarossa - I love this car. This is literally at the top of my "lottery car" list - a first-year "Red Head". The styling, even today, is fresh, clean, and fast looking; the rear-engine, rear-drive set-up defining supercars for decades to come. And it was Sonny Crockett's car in "Miami Vice" - how on earth could you get any more 1980s cool than that?

2. 1985 Lamborghini Countach - everything about this car, from the wild scissor doors to the wiiiide rear tires to the ginormous rear fin screamed speed. This car absolutely defined fast for the 1980s, starring in such memorable 1980s movies as "Cannonball Run" and "Rain Man".

3. Porsche 928 - It was in "Risky Business", Tom Cruise's break-out movie. This was the car that inspired the line "Sometimes you gotta say, 'What the fuck'." This was Porsche's first V8-powered car, a large, lumbering beast that heralded a new direction for Porsche, their breakaway car that would help them shed the last ties to Volkswagen. Except that no one wanted the automatic-transmission, front-engine V8 Porsche, preferring the rear-engine six cylinder turbos instead. It's still darn cool.

4. 1983 Toyota Celica GTS - hey, it's the first manual transmission car I ever drove. It was also the last generation of rear-wheel drive Celicas before they went to FWD in 1986. Sadly, this was the time-frame when Japanese cars were manufactured primarily out of compressed rust, so very few examples remain...

5. 1983 VW GTI - I'll admit to bias here; I owned a 1986 GTI that was quite possibly more fun than should have been allowed - I used to hit offramps at insane rates of speed just to get the inside rear wheel off the ground in the turn. I also had about five or six friends who owned GTIs of varying ages, most of whom rolled their GTIs at some point (although one crashed head on into a tree at 40 MPH and walked away from it unscathed...). The GTI is also responsible for popularizing the term "pocket rocket". Well, as it pertains to cars, that is...

6. 1981 Datsun 280ZX - When I bought the aforementioned GTI, I had taken out a personal loan to buy a car after leaving college (I gave my old Buick to my sister for her first car). I took out this loan because I had fallen in love with a 1981 Datsun 280ZX for sale nearby. The Datsun sold before I could nail down the loan, so I wound up with the GTI instead. Such is life.


7. 1988 Honda CRX - what's not to like about a teeny little two seater that got 40 MPG on the highway and tore up the autocross track? 1988 saw a re-styling of the Honda line to include flush headlights, bringing a cleaner look to the dated inset bezels Honda had been using (to be fair, pretty much EVERY car manufaturer had the inset headlight bezels in the 1980s).


8. 1988 BMW 325iC - I have to admit to a bit of nostalgia for the '88 Beamer convertible, as a buddy of mine had one back in the day and it was a fun car to cruise the beach in (major chick magnet, which given my mullet at the time was well-needed...). It's a classic shape that looks as good now some 20 years later.

9. 1983 Ferrari 308GTS - Ferrari is the only manufacturer to get a double listing, as there was no way I could pass up the 308, the car driven by "Magnum P.I.". The 308GTS is, I would argue, the car that comes to mind when someone speaks the name "Ferrari".

10. 1986 Mercedes 300E AMG "Hammer" - how can you not love a big, fat, heavy four door luxury sedan that can accelerate from 0 - 60 MPH in 5.4 seconds? SRSLY! Mercedes, the "Cadillac" of the European luxury car market (meaning they're for the, um, advancing in years set), stuffed a 5.5L V8 monster into a 300 series and the super-sedan was born.




Well, there's my list of the best foreign cars of the 1980s. As always, feel free to critique, debate, or add your own favorite car(s) in comments.

That is all.

Friday Gun Pr0n #83

Sadly, I don't have a CZ-83 to showcase today for the numerical aspect. What I do have, though, is an interesting little gun:



This is a "Kraft Prod" model K-25 .25 ACP. It's a Baby Browning knock-off, done rather poorly, but that's all I know about it. There's no information available that I can find for it, which is unfortunate - it needs a new set of springs, badly. The one and only time I took it to the range, it got off two shots before misfiring something awful - in fact, it had a hangfire, the first time I've ever experienced one.

I've done a quick search around the 'net for information on "Kraft Prod" and "Kraft Products" to no avail; there's nothing out there I can find on this manufacturer. I'd like to try my hand at some minor amateur gunsmithing, as I was given the gun for free and it's not currently working, so at the very worst I've got a gun I can turn in at the next "buyback" and make $200...

Anyone know where to find information on oddball firearms?

That is all.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Mid-Afternoon Musings

Okay. Things have quieted down somewhat; at least to a dull roar. Some random thoughts to get through the rest of the afternoon, then I'm off on a four-day weekend. Tomorrow's off to get ready for the Cub Scout Overnight on Saturday/Sunday, then I'm taking Monday off as a "Mental Health" day (plus I'm burning vacation time before the end of the year). Needless to say, I'm going to the range. The way things are shaping, it will entail large-caliber handgun goodness...

In no particular order, then...

*As much as I'd like to agree with my right-leaning brethren around the blogosphere, I don't see McCain pulling a "USA defeats Russia for the gold" victory on Tuesday. He's being out-spent like 50:1 (with, of course, no comment whatsoever by the media on Obama's "pledge" to take public funding, natch), he's got the media actively working against him, and he's running out of time in key states. I certainly hope I'm wrong, mind you, but I don't hold out a lot of hope come Wednesday morning November 5th.

*I've changed my mind on Question 3 on the MA Ballot initiatives and will be voting No thanks in large part to the excellent comments received on my post. I plead guilty to a moment of emotional weakness, and promise to heed that inner voice that asks "What path yields more freedom?" going forward.

*Firming up plans to shore up the ol' G armory before the end of the year; there is definitely an AR-15 variant in the works as well as another AK-47 semi-auto clone. The AR-15 variant I'm gonna need some suggestions for; the local gun shop has a DPMS Panther Arms AP4 Carbine for under $900, that's looking like a strong contender. The AK clone is going to be pretty much whatever I can lay my grubby mitts on when I get my year-end bonus. If there's any money left over, I'll order an AR-15 lower and an M1 Carbine from OCDMP.

*An early reminder that National Ammo Day is coming up in a few weeks.

*Heh. One of my upcoming posts is going to detail Obama's campaign promises so we can all watch him deliver them to us with the help of the Democratically controlled House and Senate. I'm certain that a single-party government will easily enact all the pretty plans and dramatic dreams of the chief executive. Isn't that right, Governor Patrick?

That is all.

AUGH!

Today is not going well.

The scanner won't scan. The kids missed the bus. Every asshat in the known universe got in front of me on the road today. Work is totally kicking my pasty white ass.

And we stand poised to elect a gun-grabbing socialist to the highest office in the land in just five days.

Somedays it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps, yannowhatamean?

That is all.

Get (Re)Loaded...

Okay.

I have come to the realization that it is time to start thinking about learning to reload.

One of the major advantages of finally getting off my duff and joining the local gun club is that I've been shooting more (well, not recently, but...). One of the disadvantages is that... I've been shooting more. Shootin' is 'spensive, bubba. And .22LR, while a lot of fun, gets pretty boring after a while...

So I've decided that it's time. It is time to take the plunge and explore the crazy and exciting world of reloading. A new friend has generously offered to take me under his wing and guide me through the process, which is a good thing - I'm somewhat skittish about this undertaking, as I've seen plenty of examples of what can go wrong. One of the big reasons I've stayed away from reloading is that it requires a significant amount of concentration and dedication that I haven't yet been able to devote.

Well, I've decided I'm ready.

So I need a primer (HA! A reloading pun!) on getting started. What's a good set-up for a beginner reloader? Is there one set-up that's good for both rifle and pistol rounds? I shoot a LOT more pistol than rifle, but a lot of that has to do with cost (on average, pistol rounds are significantly cheaper than rifle rounds). For example, I'd love to take the Marlin 336 out to the range more often (I've shot it once, I think), but at $15 - $20 for a box of 20 rounds it's just too pricey.

Another reason is the indoor range at the gun club - we're only allowed lead bullets, no jacketed ammo of any kind allowed. While I can get plenty of .38 special wadcutters, that's about the limit of readily-available lead rounds for the guns I own. It would be nice to work up some .45 ACP wadcutters for the 1911s (even I, a complete farmer, know not to run lead reloads through a Glock) or some .380 ACP for the Makarov (which will digest pretty much anything I put into it. I have a sneaking suspicion I could load a 50 year old hollowpoint soaked in penetrating oil into this gun and it would still fire. In backwards.).

This is a multi-tiered bleg for my reloading readers. First off, what's a good, sturdy, inexpensive set-up for an introduction to reloading? Actually, back that up. What the heck is the difference between a single-stage press and a progressive press? What are manufacturers to look for or avoid? What the heck are die sets? What other equipment am I going to need? Brass tumblers, kinetic bullet pullers, dies, resizers; there's a brave new world of gear and lingo I need to learn before I even get started...

Secondly, before I go crazy with all the gear, is there a manual or "Dummy's Guide to Reloading" out there? Something that waters down the technical stuff for a beginner, but not so much that I wind up doing something like this... MidwayUSA has a dizzying array of books, manuals, and videos available; are these worthwhile, or will they bore me to tears long before imparting any wisdom? Are there any resources I should investigate (or avoid) for information on getting started (websites, forums, etc)?

Lastly, if nothing else, I invite any reloaders to share their experience with me - get me enthusiastic about this undertaking. There's an awful lot to learn, with a fantastic potential payoff but also a pretty severe and unforgiving learning curve (as evidenced by this website). While I grok the concept of cheaper ammo, being able to roll my own, and even potentially casting my own bullets (talk about a good skill to have in the post-apocalyptic world!); I shudder to think of my Ruger Security Six becoming a Ruger-grenade, or my 1991A1 suffering a Glock-like KaBoom...

Any pointers, hints, links, stories, etc. are appreciated. I'm hoping to get into this sometime by the end of the year or beginning of the new year, so this is more just the information gathering stage. Right now, there's no such thing as "too basic" or "too simple" - I am brand-spanking new to this, and want to make sure I do it right...

Thanks in advance.

That is all.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

They Say It's Your Birthday, Part?

Today's a certain Uncle's birthday. Go wish him well, that young pup...

That is all.

Earworm...

Y'know, if you've just got to have a tune stuck in your head, Rush's "Cinderella Man" ain't a bad one to have. Especially that kickin' bass riff...

Just sayin'...

That is all.

Schadenfreude...

Dianne Wilkerson accused of taking $23G in bribes
In a Beacon Hill brasserie just feet from the State House, where oysters on the half shell will set most back a tank of gas, Sen. Dianne Wilkerson slithered a greased palm up her cardigan and stuffed $1,000 in bribe money into her bra, federal prosecutors allege.

On any given weekday, No. 9 Park is the place for an ambitious legislator to be seen chewing the fat. But on June 18, 2007, Wilkerson, 54, was apparently unaware that the government informant who’d just handed her 10 $100 bills allegedly in exchange for her twisting the arms of a who’s who of political powerbrokers to obtain one liquor license had brought a hidden camera to lunch, as well.

I wonder if we will finally be able to put this criminal in jail, rather than back on Beacon Hill?

And, just because I can't savor this moment enough:

A Closer Look At Wilkerson's Alleged Bribery

Which details the allegations along with pictures of Wilkerson actually hiding the bribes.

And:

Wilkerson Allegations Disappoint Politicians

I love this:
In the months before her September primary loss, it wasn't uncommon to see Wilkerson standing with Democratic leaders. At a news conference announcing the repeal of a 1913 law, she was praised by House Speaker Sal DiMasi and Gov. Deval Patrick.

On Tuesday, Gov. Patrick issued this statement: "The initial reports are both troubling and sad. These are very serious charges and I will trust the judicial process to take them seriously."

Mayor Thomas Menino, according to the affidavit, was lobbied by Wilkerson on behalf of someone who was allegedly bribing her.

Yeah, there's certainly nothing in Wilkerson's past to indicate she might have more than a passing familiarity with the MA criminal code and the penalties for breaking certain elements. You know, like Federal tax evasion or repeated campaign finance violations...

Sometimes, bad things happen to bad people, too.

That is all.

MA Ballot Questions

In which Jay deconstructs the three ballot questions posed to Massachusetts voters in an attempt to illustrate his philosophical leanings. There are three questions on the ballot this year in Massachusetts. Question One deals with income tax, Question Two concerns the penalties for marijuana possession, and Question Three takes aim at dog racing in MA.

So away we go!



Question 1 has gotten the most press and debate, as it deals with abolishing the state income tax:

SUMMARY

This proposed law would reduce the state personal income tax rate to 2.65% for all categories of taxable income for the tax year beginning on or after January 1, 2009, and would eliminate the tax for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010.

The personal income tax applies to income received or gain realized by individuals and married couples, by estates of deceased persons, by certain trustees and other fiduciaries, by persons who are partners in and receive income from partnerships, by corporate trusts, and by persons who receive income as shareholders of “S corporations” as defined under federal tax law. The proposed law would not affect the tax due on income or gain realized in a tax year beginning before January 1, 2009.

The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.

A YES VOTE would reduce the state personal income tax rate to 2.65% for the tax year beginning on January 1, 2009, and would eliminate the tax for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010.

A NO VOTE would make no change in state income tax laws.

I'm voting "Yes", even though it's about as futile a gesture as one can make. The reason I'm so pessimistic is that in 2000 we had a binding referendum question on the ballot rolling the state income tax back to 5.0% from 5.75%. It passed overwhelmingly, yet when it came time to implement the rollback, the legislation elected to ignore the will of the people entirely. The rate was finally reduced, but only to 5.3%, not 5% even.

There is literally no reason to suspect that the legislature would respect the will of the people this time, either - especially with such a major revamp of the tax code. Cutting off a revenue stream is a sure way to slow the growth of government. Obviously this doesn't sit well with the cradle-to-grave nanny-statists. I don't know if it will pass - I doubt it, as anti-question 1 commercials and signs outnumber the pro- commercials about 500 billion to one...



Question 2 revolves around the penalties for possession of marijuana:

SUMMARY

This proposed law would replace the criminal penalties for possession of one ounce or less of marijuana with a new system of civil penalties, to be enforced by issuing citations, and would exclude information regarding this civil offense from the state's criminal record information system. Offenders age 18 or older would be subject to forfeiture of the marijuana plus a civil penalty of $100. Offenders under the age of 18 would be subject to the same forfeiture and, if they complete a drug awareness program within one year of the offense, the same $100 penalty.

Offenders under 18 and their parents or legal guardian would be notified of the offense and the option for the offender to complete a drug awareness program developed by the state Department of Youth Services. Such programs would include ten hours of community service and at least four hours of instruction or group discussion concerning the use and abuse of marijuana and other drugs and emphasizing early detection and prevention of substance abuse.

The penalty for offenders under 18 who fail to complete such a program within one year could be increased to as much as $1,000, unless the offender showed an inability to pay, an inability to participate in such a program, or the unavailability of such a program. Such an offender's parents could also be held liable for the increased penalty. Failure by an offender under 17 to complete such a program could also be a basis for a delinquency proceeding.

The proposed law would define possession of one ounce or less of marijuana as including possession of one ounce or less of tetrahydrocannibinol ("THC"), or having metabolized products of marijuana or THC in one's body.

Under the proposed law, possessing an ounce or less of marijuana could not be grounds for state or local government entities imposing any other penalty, sanction, or disqualification, such as denying student financial aid, public housing, public financial assistance including unemployment benefits, the right to operate a motor vehicle, or the opportunity to serve as a foster or adoptive parent. The proposed law would allow local ordinances or bylaws that prohibit the public use of marijuana, and would not affect existing laws, practices, or policies concerning operating a motor
vehicle or taking other actions while under the influence of marijuana, unlawful possession of prescription forms of marijuana, or selling, manufacturing, or trafficking in marijuana.

The money received from the new civil penalties would go to the city or town where the offense occurred.

A YES VOTE would replace the criminal penalties for possession of one ounce or less of marijuana with a new system of civil penalties.

A NO VOTE would make no change in state criminal laws concerning possession of marijuana.

I am also voting "Yes" on this question, as it's one step closer to decriminalization, which is the first step to legalization. I cannot fathom how alcohol can be legal and marijuana is not. It boggles the mind that alcohol, which one can purchase at virtually any corner store, is perfectly legal to purchase, consume, etc. whereas marijuana will get you arrested. There is no logical reason for this - marijuana is no more addictive, altering, or dangerous than alcohol. Physically, the dangers of smoking marijuana center mainly on the actually smoking part; long term damage, aside from smoking, is far less pervasive (and open to interpretation) than even moderate alcohol consumption.

I certainly don't expect this bill to pass; they haven't even bothered running ads against it. The only pro-ads have been long-time cops who agree with the idea of making MJ possession more of a ticketable offense rather than a crime. Which, really, is better than it being an arrestable offense. I don't have a dog in this particular hunt, as I don't partake (I quit smoking cigarettes before my son was born and swore off *all* smoking then), but any time we can claw back a small amount of freedom we're all better off.



Question 3 tackles an ethical dilemma, the racing of dogs for sport:

SUMMARY

This proposed law would prohibit any dog racing or racing meeting in Massachusetts where any form of betting or wagering on the speed or ability of dogs occurs.

The State Racing Commission would be prohibited from accepting or approving any application or request for racing dates for dog racing.

Any person violating the proposed law could be required to pay a civil penalty of not less than $20,000 to the Commission. The penalty would be used for the Commission’s administrative purposes, subject to appropriation by the state Legislature. All existing parts of the chapter of the state’s General Laws concerning dog and horse racing meetings would be interpreted as if they did not refer to dogs.

These changes would take effect January 1, 2010. The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.

A YES VOTE would prohibit dog races on which betting or wagering occurs, effective January 1, 2010.

A NO VOTE would make no change in the laws governing dog racing.
I'm voting "Yes" on this question as well - three "Yes" votes in a row. I'm not an animal person - I am extremely allergic to animal dander, meaning basically that even short-term exposure to cats, dogs, mice, hamsters, etc. leaves me literally gasping for breath. I've never had a cherished childhood pet, never bonded with a four-footed housemate, never felt the stinging pain of loss when a lifelong friend slipped away.

And yet I have a soft spot for animals. I've taken my children to the circus on several occasions, and I wince when the animals are prodded or whipped. I empathize with the protestors who want the animals freed - I disagree with their methods, but not their goal. It saddens me that great and majestic animals are reduced to mere playthings for our amusement, that in this day and age we need to denigrate other species for a quick laugh or a moment's amusement.

I haven't the foggiest idea if this will pass or not. I suspect not, as there are numerous dog tracks around the state, and one riiiight over the border in Seabrook NH that will be more than happy to take all the dog racing dollar$ MAholes want to spend. Plus the general consensus lately has been to allow more gambling rather than less, and one of the ways they've tried to stave off allowing casinos has been to allow some slot machines at dog tracks...



Well, there you have it, my ballot questions broken down and explained away. For the MA residents out there reading, feel free to debate my positions or support my choices. For residents in other states, please take the time to read your states' ballot questions carefully and study both sides of the question.

That is all.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Dubious Distinction...

Looking through my Sitemeter referrals, I find out that I am in the top 20 hits for an interesting search string.

Yeah. Classy all the way, that's me...

That is all.

Tragedies and Jerking Knees

Something went horribly wrong at this past weekend's machine gun shoot at Westfield Sportsman's Club. During their annual full-auto shoot, which is open to the public for a fee, someone handed an 8 year old boy a micro-Uzi to shoot. He squeezed the trigger, the gun fired, and the sharp recoil and muzzle climb resulted in him shooting himself in the head. He died shortly thereafter.

It's a horrible, senseless tragedy, and one that was entirely preventable. The Range Officer should not have allowed the gun to be fired without supervision. The father should have been more attentive, and perhaps waited until after the first salvo to take pictures. There's a lot of "should haves", little facts. One thing is for certain, though. This being MA, there's no shortage of asshats ready to pounce on this tragedy to further restrict our freedoms.
State Representative Michael Costello, the Newburyport Democrat who co-chairs the Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, said yesterday that he plans to draft a bill that would ban anyone younger than age 21 from firing an automatic weapon.

"This isn't a knee-jerk reaction; it's a common sense reaction," he said. "We should take swift action to provide some reasonable restrictions on this type of unreasonable practice. It's almost indescribable that within a year of leaving a booster seat, an 8-year-old can be holding a submachine gun."

The surest sign that it IS a knee-jerk reaction is this jack-off's insistence on telling us it isn't. Look, Representative Costello, could you please tell us exactly how many other minors have been killed by machine-gun fire in the Commonwealth? Here's a hint: Close your eyes. What do you see? Yeah, nothing. None. This is a tragedy, to be certain; but is an aberration, a statistical outlier so far outside the norm that we'd be better served banning all hard candies for the handful of kids who choke to death each year.

It's going to be awfully interesting watching Representative Costello explain to the US Armed Forces how soldiers in MA won't be able to use machine guns until they turn 21, too...

Look, The Boy is almost 8. This hits home especially hard for me; Mrs. G. heard the news and it sent her over the edge - we've gone back and forth about me taking him to the gun club for the first time, and this incident has set me back at least a couple of years. I feel The Boy is ready; he shows excellent command of the Four Rules; he does well with his BB gun; under my tutelage he has proven himself ready.

But in the blink of an eye, all that means nothing. The news can't wait to stand over the body and demonize gun owners, claiming that this is what the NRA wants all along - Uzis in the hands of children. Regardless of how tightly Class III weaponry is regulated; regardless of the insane number of hoops one must jump through to get regular gun permit in MA, let alone a green card (Machine Gun license); one sensational accident and it all goes out the window.

How big of a jump is it to go from "No one under the age of 21 may fire a machine gun" to "No one under the age of 21 may fire a semi-automatic weapon" to "No one under the age of 21 may touch a firearm of any sort"? Not very. What does that do to the shooting sports? When we can't share our passion with our children; when we are prohibited by law from bringing our sons to the gun club for an afternoon of target shooting; when there are no more Junior teams... All because of a tragedy less common than drowning in a five gallon bucket?

Look, I think handing an 8 year old a fully automatic weapon is insane. I know that age group well, and in general they don't have the physical dexterity nor the maturity to handle something that serious. Hell, I'm a full-grown man and I'd be a little nervous about shooting a Micro Uzi - they've got an insane rate of fire and are very light. I've shot a fully automatic Glock pistol before, but that had a shoulder stock on it for controllability. Whether the father knew how difficult it was to handle or not is immaterial - if he knew, shame on him for letting the kid fire unsupervised. If he didn't know, shame on him for not finding out before letting his son take the firearm.

But passing a law to prohibit this? Senseless. It does absolutely NOTHING other than pave the way for future infringements on our Second Amendment rights. Nothing. It won't save lives, because the target of the bill is so infinitesimally small that you might as well ban gravity for all the good it's going to do. But the potential for this to act as a springboard for future restrictions is great. The return is negligible, the danger high.

Knee-jerk indeed.

That is all.

The Great Outdoors

The Cub Scout Overnight is this Saturday. Once the Halloween parties were over (yes, plural - the PTA's "Halloween Howl" was Friday night [and Mrs. G. is the secretary of the PTA] and the Cub Scout Halloween party was Saturday night), I turned my attention to gathering the last of the gear The Boy and I would need for our night in the wilderness. In November. In New Hampshire.

I've always loved camping. Now, I've only done "car camping", which means that all my gear is brought from the car to the campsite for set-up. I haven't backpacked in, or mountain-biked in, or even carried my gear in on the Harley. My gear is decidedly old-school, with a Coleman stove and lantern that formerly belonged to my parents - from before I was born. I've added a propane lantern to the mix, as it's much easier to use then the liquid lantern (especially around the Scouts), but I prefer the old stove and lantern whenever possible.

I did a lot of camping as a graduate student; there's something about the low cost of camping out (free, if you know where to look; otherwise darn close to free in a pinch) that appeals to someone making less than minimum wage. While the pay wasn't great, my advisor insisted on us taking at least two weeks off over the summer, which meant grabbing the tent, the rest of the gear, and heading north, south, or west to find a new location to explore.

We gravitated mostly north, to the White Mountains region of NH. Wide open spaces, plenty of hiking, fishing, climbing, etc. - this was even back when you could see the Old Man in the Mountain. We climbing Mount Washington; traveled the Kancamagus Highway; played poker under a blue tarp in the pouring rain somewhere south of North Conway. Vacations were a lot simpler then; a borrowed tent, an old sleeping bag, and a folding chair that doubled as a bed meant a week's worth of sleeping late, drinking beer all day long, and worrying only about remembering to get ice and more beer.

Somewhere along the way, though, it became more than just drinking beer in the woods. It became exploration, the quest for the perfect location. It became a night spent in absolute quiet somewhere along Tripoli road, a desolate access road to a ski resort, utterly useless in July except for cheap camping ($20 per carload per week). No showers, no bathrooms (dig a latrine!), just a giant fire pit six feet across with a rock the size of a Volkswagen at the back. One year we made at least a half-cord of wood disappear in that fire pit over the course of a week.

I have no sense of smell. I can't reminisce about the smells of the campsite, the bacon grilling in a cast-iron frypan or coffee percolating over smouldering hot embers of the previous night's bonfire. What I do have, commented on by many friends, is an acute ear - my lack of smell has apparently resulted in my hearing being significantly amplified as a method of compensation. While I may not smell the bacon, I hear it sizzle. While the coffee's aroma may escape me, the sound of the coffee percolating in the tin coffee pot alerts me to impending caffeination.

I think it's a pretty fair trade.


I might miss the smell of fresh flowers along a trail, but I hear each cricket's unique chirp. I can echolocate a bullfrog within 5 feet of his actual position. The flutter of a bat's wings in twilight lets me know that the mosquito population is about to dwindle. The light snap of a twig indicates a skunk may be penetrating our perimeter (time to "mark" the boundaries of the campsite again!). There's an absolutely amazing world out there in the woods; life bursts from every fallen tree, murky swamp, and forest floor. Footfalls on a carpet of pine needles make a sound one never hears in the city; the rustle of a wild animal in the tall grass just beyond the treeline gives an adrenaline rush unlike any other.

And Saturday night I get to share this with The Boy. Now, we'll be in a camp full of Cub Scouts. Most likely there will be too much noise to fully embrace the outdoors; the season is too far along for all of nature's creatures to be present; we're not bringing any beer, wine, or other spirits to "enhance" the experience. But I'll have my son with me. And I'll get to add a whole new world of sounds to my repetoire.

I can't wait.

That is all.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Puttin' Out Feelers...

Okay, the reports of the Indy blogmeet, combined with the recent Gun Blogger Rendezvous III, has gotten me thinking again...

(As I said in my last post, be afraid. Be very afraid).

Who would be interested in a Northeast Blogger Meeting? I'm thinking we could make it a twice-yearly affair, with a shooting event in the summer months and a pub/brewery/eating establishment type meeting in the late fall/winter months. Depending on attendees, we could do something in Boston proper (as long as I can take the train in!) or southern NH.

Let me know if you're interested. I'll even take the hit for the team and coordinate the where, when, and why. (I must be a glutton for punishment...) Given sufficient planning, we should be able to plan a meeting for anyone who wants to attend - bloggers, commenters, and lurkers all welcome (well, only the good kind of lurkers, natch...)

That is all.

Notably Absent...

Just some random observations about things I've noticed missing from this Presidential election campaign.

*Gun control. Nothing. Nada. Even thought Barack Obama was on the Board of Directors of the extremely anti-gun Joyce Foundation, we have heard nothing about either candidate's views on the Second Amendment other than empty proclamations of support from Barack Obama. We haven't even seen the John Kerry-esque "can I get me a huntin' license" photo-op from Barry; one can only assume that he's written off the gun owner vote entirely.


*Military service. Other than hearing how John McCain's military service does not automatically make him qualified to be President or that he relies too heavily on his POW status, we have heard little-to-nothing about the importance of military service. This is, of course, a stark contrast to the 2000 and 2004 campaigns, where military service, or one's alleged lack thereof, was the be-all, end-all qualification. See Meme, Chickenhawk.


*Foreign policy experience. I believe the joke was something along the lines of "George Bush's foreign policy experience consists of eating at an International House of Pancakes" - that as a two-term governor of the state with the longest stretch of international border had insufficient experience dealing with foreign governments to be President. A case could be made in the general sense, that experience itself has not been an issue - unless, of course, we're talking about Sarah Palin.


*Gravitas. Interesting, isn't it, that wunderkind Obama didn't need the addition of Joe Biden to bring "gravitas" to his campaign. A community organizer turned state senator turned US Senator, with less than a year's experience on the national stage before running for the highest political office in America, didn't need an old fossil as veep to lend this mythical "gravitas" to his campaign.

The differences are, indeed, stunning. It's a parallel to the 1992 campaign that Bill Clinton waged against Bush the Elder. Only Clinton at least had some executive experience under his belt when he ran for President, of course. And we all know how that turned out. Brady Bill. AWB. First pass at socialized medicine. Largest middle class tax increase in history.

Folks, unless something drastic happens between today and next Tuesday, we are going to elect the most left-wing, most pro-socialism, least experienced person to ever run for President to the highest office in the land. We're going to hand control of the whole shootin' match to one political party, with possibly a bulletproof majority to rubber-stamp whatever this neophyte wants.

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

That is all.

Danger, Will Robinson, Danger, Danger!

Senate Democrats eye 'magic 60'
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sens. Mitch McConnell and Elizabeth Dole are two top Republicans lawmakers who find themselves fighting to hold on to their Senate seats.

They're also two reasons why Democrats are talking 60 -- the number of seats needed to secure filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.

"We are feeling really good that we are going to pick up a successful amount of the larger number of seats and have a successful election. As for 60? It is possible," said New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, who runs campaign operations for the Senate Democrats.

Can you say renewed Assault Weapons Ban? I knew that you could...

Nothing like counting your chickens before they hatch, eh Chuck?

Lots and lots at stake next Tuesday, folks. Please don't stay home or sit this one out just to teach the GOP a lesson. Handing the Democrats all three branches of government with a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate would be a really bad fucking thing. And think back to the last time it happened. 1977...

That is all.

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Sunday Afternoon Musings...

Random thoughts on a Sunday afternoon...

Cub Scout Halloween party was last night. Four hours of prep. Two solid hours of Igor the hunchback leading young men from 6 to 10 through the Hallway of Terror translates into one sore back and a mighty sore throat.

And a whole mess of Scouts who will talk about Eye-gor the rest of the year...

That's a trade-off I can live with. It's a small sacrifice, one's dignity, in the grand scheme of things. Rather than being viewed as the stern authoritarian figure, the boys see me as the adult willing to make myself look foolish for the success of the Halloween party. I crack jokes, make obscure '80s pop culture references to keep the parents engaged, and generally make a complete and utter buffoon out of myself for the evening (no comments from the peanut gallery inquiring as to how that's different from any other day, thanyouverymuch...).

The hard part, though, is transitioning from Igor the goofball back into Cubmaster Jay the hardass for next weekend for our Scout Overnight. We have several dozen Scouts and their parents who will be looking very critically at how we comport ourselves - and handle any issues - on the second overnight of our Pack's history. I wrote about last year's fiasco and the fallout from it, and we have ZERO desire to repeat the mistakes of history. This time next week will tell whether we can negotiate that particular minefield, or if we will have to put the kibosh on future outings.

I'm hoping the grown-ups can act like, well, grown-ups this year.




Right now I'm home with BabyGirl G, just a lazy Daddy-daughter afternoon. She's been chained to her room all morning in a vain attempt to find her rug. She obviously inherited her father's sense of room-cleaning ability (none). Finally managed to starve her into submission (no lunch until we can at least see the floor in your room, young lady!), and now she's downstairs having her favorite lunch (hot dogs and macaroni and cheese; were it up to her, that's all she would ever eat).

Mrs. G. and The Boy are visiting the local farm stand, which has set up a corn maze in one of their fallow fields. We saw the maze when we went apple picking earlier this month, and The Boy expressed interest in going through the maze. At the time we declined, as BabyGirl G was in a foul mood (she's starting young) and having two fighting children in an enclosed space just spelled out "bad idea". So while I sit and listen to BGG chow down, Mrs. G is escorting The Boy through the maze. It's a good day. Alas, it will only last a few more minutes, until we re-group and fight the mob at the grocery store...




Most men look forward to fall as the start of the football season. The falling leaves, the brisk winds; to most of the male species it signifies a return to the gridiron, either reliving the glory days of high school, living vicariously through one's progeny, or simply sharing the cameraderie of watching the big game on a jumbo-sized television at the local sports bar.

But not this male.

To me, fall signifies the return of sweaters, fleece pullovers, and sweatshirts which herald the return of the winter carry gun. The colder weather allows a wider range of options in the personal protection arena - since outer garments are now necessary, the CCW choices are no longer limited to "that which fits in my pocket"... It's really about the only thing I have to look foward to this time of year, as all I can think about is skyrocketing home heating costs and the impending onset of snow and... the dreaded winter drivers.

At least they provide blog fodder, right?

That is all.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Yes, Even More Media Bias...

Alternate title: SRSLY? This is what passes for campaign news?

After Joe the Plumber, Joe the Hothead?
WASHINGTON (AP) — First there was Joe the Plumber. Is Joe the Hothead next?
Joe McCain said Friday he'll withdraw from campaign activities for his brother, GOP presidential nominee John McCain, after calling 911 to angrily complain about traffic. Joe McCain has apologized for making the call.

The candidate's younger brother, who lives in Alexandria, Va., told Washington radio station WTOP he was returning from a campaign event in Philadelphia around 2 a.m. on Oct. 18 when he got stuck in traffic on Interstate 495 at the Wilson Bridge. Police say the call was made about 1:30 a.m. Oct. 21.

Frustrated because of the traffic, Joe McCain called 911 to find out what was going on. The operator asked him to "state your emergency."

Okay, first off, Joe McCain is an imbecile. Calling 911 about traffic delays is a completely unnecessary drain on our emergency services, and he should probably be charged with making a nuisance call or somesuch. Secondly, this is a headline article? Really? A candidate's brother does something stupid? Imagine if they'd paid this much attention to Roger "my brother has a nose like a vacuum cleaner for coke" Clinton. Third, don'tcha just love how they juuuust happen to work the "hothead" angle in? One of McCain's weak spots, allegedly, is his temper. And the media's sure is quick to damn McCain based on his brother...

Between this, the idiot McCain worker who faked a hate crime attack, and "troopergate" (once again, I remind the reader the amount of attention paid to the allegations of AR State Troopers being used to escort Governor Clinton's "guests" in and out of the AR Governor's mansion...), it's all picayune crap that goes against McCain. This is complete and utter bullshit, I'm sorry. Obama gets ass-kissing puff pieces about visiting his sick grandmother (who, I hasten to add, I hope makes a complete and speedy recovery from her fall); McCain gets headlines for his brother's idiocy. Yeah. That's fairness right there.

Gah.

I need to get to the range.

That is all.

Ugh...

The Cub Scout Halloween Party is tonight. We have to transform the church where we hold our Pack Meetings into a frightening (but not too frightening) underworld capable of scaring the tar out of the Cub Scouts.

Plus arrange snacks.

My role is Igor, the tour guide through the hellish nightmare of a half-dozen 9 year olds in $10 Target "Scream" masks and referee between the scarers and the scarees. I throw myself into the role, using a mix of Ren Hoek, Marty Feldman's Igor ("that's... EYE-gor"), and Gollum. I guide the different groups of Scouts through the Hallway, leading them to each station and providing a lead-in for the adult volunteers working each station.

It involves two solid hours of me limping my way around the church basement (I am a hunchback, after all), contorting my voice, and trying to act as a referee while staying in character (or at least attempting to).

And I woke up this morning feeling like death warmed over.

Crap. It's going to take a lot of Dayquil to get through this...

That is all.

Friday, October 24, 2008

Friday Fun Thread: Ugly Cars of the 1970s

Well... We've done the good, bad, and ugly cars of the 1980s. We've done the good cars of the 1970s. Logic dictates that this week's Fun Thread would be either the bad or ugly cars of the 1970s, then.

There's one slight problem with doing the "Bad cars of the 1970s" - after 1975, they were all bad...

So we'll showcase the ugly cars of the 1970s, which is a difficult list to assemble. No, it's not that all the cars of the 1970s were that good; rather the converse - so many cars of the 1970s were just that ugly...


1. 1975 AMC Pacer - Just look at that... that... thing. A car so hideous that it rends the very fabric of space and time, sowing discontent and malaise wherever it appears. Oh, wait, that's Time Bandits. Well the Pacer is ugly enough to warp time, I think we can all agree on that.

2. 1976 Chevrolet Chevette (1977 shown) - let's see... ugly headlight assembly borrowed from the Pacer? Check. Odd, "melted" looking rear hatchback? Check. Crappy whitewalls and economy hubcaps? Check. This is one 'Vette you don't want Prince to sing about...

3. AMC Gremlin - why on earth American Motor Corporation thought naming a car after the small mythical creatures thought to plague early aircraft was a good idea is anyone's guess. Designing it to look like a door wedge didn't help, either... Interesting side note: the Gremlin was introduced on April Fool's Day 1970.

4. Ford Pinto - hmm... sense a trend here? Yes, American "compact" cars of the 1970s really were this bad. Acres of rear glass = ugly in any incarnation. SRSLY. Throw in the propensity of the car to explode if rear-ended wrong, this is the very automotive definition of Made Of Fail...

5. 1974 Dodge Dart - well, to start with, the Dodge Dart was driven by Al Bundy. The Dart looked like a parody of the Chargers and Super Bees of the late 1960s, a down-sized poser whose looks didn't translate into the smaller vehicle. The slanted back window seemed too dramatic; the front end decidedly bland; the styling a cheap copy of much better automobiles...

6. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass - How could I not include the car that was the inspiration for the 6000 SUX in Robocop? Or the police car driven by Buford T. Justice in Smokey & the Bandit (okay, that was a Pontiac LeMans, but it's the same platform). In any case, it's a bloated, ugly, rolling turd that had no business wearing the Cutlass designation...

7. Ford Granada - Growing up I had a couple of friends who owned Granadas. One friend hated his Granada so much that he refused to do any work to it - none. He didn't even change the oil, in hopes that the car would die and he could justify buying another car.

It ran for two and a half years, the last six months of which it possessed no discernable engine oil or transmission fluid.

It was, quite simply, too ugly to die.

8. 1978 Chyrsler Cordoba - never mind Ricardo Montaban praising its "rich Corinthian leather", the over/under square headlights alone automatically guarantee this car a spot on the ugly list. It had hood lines that are WAY too busy, a grotesquely ostentatious hood ornament, and the single worst aesthetic pairing yet - T-tops with a vinyl quarter roof. I'll wait while everyone goes into the rest room to be sick...

9. Chevy Luv pick-up - this would have been at or near the top of the Bad list had I drawn one up. The Luv was a re-badged Isuzu introduced in 1972 as a stopgap measure during the first gas shortage. Market analysts are still trying to decide what motivated General Motors to thrust this small block of crap with a bowtie on the American public. Even more puzzlingly, the GM/Isuzu tie remains to this day, only with Isuzu trucks being re-badged Chevy S-10s...

10. 1974 Ford Econoline van - this has got to win some sort of award for ugliest front end evah. The "hood" is laughable; the grill itself is unremarkable but manages to wrap around the front end for no good reason; the side windows are small and don't open; in short, it's an ugly box.



Okay. That's enough ugly for one day. Unless, of course, y'all can come up with something ugly(ier) that I might have overlooked (or that my brain forced out of my subconscious out of self-defense...)

That is all.

File Under "U" for Useless

Former Mass. Gov. William Weld to endorse Obama
SALEM, N.H.—Former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld, a Republican, is endorsing Democrat Barack Obama for president, citing the senator's steady leadership, good judgment and ability to unify Democrats, Republicans and independents.

"Senator Obama is a once-in-a-lifetime candidate who will transform our politics and restore America's standing in the world," Weld said in a statement released Friday. "We need a president who will lead based on our common values and Senator Obama demonstrates an ability to unite and inspire.

Excuse me, Bill, but just what the fuck have you been smoking these days? Obama has "steady leadership"? Of what, exactly? Be specific. Please give examples of Obama's alleged "leadership".
"Ability to unify Democrats, Republicans and independents"??? Please point out instances where Obama has done anything other than tow the Democratic party line. You did a great job parrotting what they told you to say.

Enjoy those 30 pieces of silver, asshole.

So Howdy Doody endorses Jughead. This is the best they can do? This is the caliber of "Republican" they can pay off to endorse Barack Obama? Guys who are still pissed off after more than a decade that their hopes of being an ambassador were torpedoed by Jesse Helms? Guys who have been out of the political arena for more than a decade?

Nice try. I don't fuckin' think so.

That is all.

Friday Gun Pr0n #82

Today's gun is inspired by the lively chat that accompanied this past Tuesday's Gun Nuts. The second part of the show centered on "favorite guns" (I of course had to mention my grandfather's Colt Official Police), and the conversation turned to the first gun ever fired.

Well, here she is:



That's a Stevens Model 311C .410 side-by-side shotgun. I shot this about, oh, thirty years ago while tromping around in the woods with Dad G. I don't even remember what we were allegedly "hunting" - I think Dad just felt it was time for his boy to fire his first shotgun. Would have probably been better had I not fired both barrels at once, though.

Fear not. Dad caught the gun before it hit the ground.

Anyhoo, I haven't shot it since. One of these days I'm going to bring it to the sooper-seekrit range and see how .410 birdshot does in redneck trap...

That is all.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Ask & Ye Shall Receive...

Tam opined about tactical mustaches a while back, and we here at MArooned are nothing if not accommodating:




Y'see, the "skin stripes" I carved for the Ren Faire weren't exactly well-received in the professional environment. Nothing was said, exactly, but the general atmosphere to the unconventional facial hair was less-than-inviting, I'll leave it at that.

Plus it was a stone cold bee-yotch to shave those teeny stripes in...

So I cut it back to a mustache, but held off on trimming for a bit... Voila! Instant '70s pornstache...

That is all.

That Horse is Dead, Jim

Yep. The mainstream media continues to carry water for the Obama campaign.

Gov. Sarah Palin, Todd Palin to give depositions
(CNN) -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and her husband will provide depositions Friday to the state Personnel Board, which is looking into whether Palin unfairly fired Alaska's public safety director this summer, the couple's attorney told CNN.

Thomas Van Flein said he will be present for the depositions by the governor and her husband, Todd Palin. Each deposition will be done separately, with Palin, the Republican vice presidential candidate, giving hers in St. Louis, Missouri, a campaign adviser said.

I haven't seen this much attention paid to such a non-story since, oh, the Valerie Plame kerfluffle. You remember her, right? The "covert" CIA agent who showed the world how covert she was by posing for magazine covers... The story that wouldn't die despite any evidence whatsoever of any wrongdoing by Karl Rove ("frog-marched out of the Oval Office in handcuffs", remember?) or Bush/Cheney. (Scooter Libby was indicted for perjury, a charge we were told during the Clinton Impeachment that "no one is ever prosecuted for perjury"...)

Keep flogging that dead horse, MSM. Perhaps you can give a bit more coverage to Barry's poor ailing grandmother less than two weeks before the election. Maybe work in a few Glamour Shots of Barry holding an adorable kitten, with alternating shots of John McCain kicking puppies.

Seems to be about par for the course for the media coverage of this Presidential campaign...

That is all.

How Much Is Enough?

In the comments of my "Wish List" thread last week, commenter Wally asked
Can you expand on how you came up with your target mag quantities? Just curious about your thinkin'.

Well, any time I try to explain my thought process, my brain starts hurting, but I'll give it a whirl... ;)

Basically, I think one should have enough magazines on hand to load up 100 - 200 rounds (depending, of course, on the magazine - 40 round M1 carbine magazines are a different case than 6 round Defender magazines). Double that number (in an ideal world) for the Assault Weapon Ban scenario for redundancy's sake - the "two is one, one is none" principle. Now, granted, this is for guns that get shot regularly, of course - the WWII Luger that gets shot once every 5 years obviously doesn't need 8 magazines; the AR-15 that gets shot in competition might be best served with 15 - 20 magazines from 5- to 90 rounds.

For a semi-automatic pistol that's going to serve as a carry piece, the minimum I'd recommend is 3 magazines - one in the gun, one to carry for back-up, and a third to rotate. In this case, more is always better, especially if you're planning on a high capacity magazine that might not be legal in six months' time. Six to eight would be a good number of magazines for such a scenario, although upwards of a dozen couldn't hurt either... It depends on the gun and the magazine, IMHO - a 1911 where you can find a decent Chip McCormack magazine for $10 - $12 or a Makarov where you can find 8-round magazines for $5 each is a lot different than an HK with $40 magazines. Or I could just be cheap...

As far as ammo goes, I subscribe to the theory that says:
"The only way time you have too much ammo is if you have to carry it all".

Unless you're planning on moving it all at one time, there is no such thing as too much ammo. As we've seen in the past couple of years, ammo prices have been rising almost as much as gas prices. The more you buy NOW, the less you have to buy in a year's time when the price has gone up 2-3 more times. The absolute minimum for a safe queen, IMHO, is 100 rounds; for any firearm that you shoot regularly, 500 rounds would be a baseline level. 1,000 rounds plus all available magazines filled to capacity is better. 5,000 rounds of "common" ammo (9mm, .45 ACP, .223, .308, 7.62X39mm, etc.) is ambitious but cushions against sharp spikes in prices or temporary shortages. And .22LR? 10 - 20K rounds at a minimum of bulk ammo; 1-2K of mid-range target ammo.

The harder part, I've found, is deciding how much premium ammo to have on hand at any given time. Carry ammo for pistols or hunting ammo for rifles is significantly more expensive than FMJ target or mil-surp ammo, generally 2-4X the cost as a rule of thumb. For a box of 20 rounds of jacketed hollowpoint 9mm+P+, for example, you can expect to pay ~ $20. A box of 100 rounds of FMJ Winchester White Box (WWB) is also $20. Hunting ammo runs about the same, a 20 round box of .308 Winchester JSP might fetch $22, whereas mil-surp 7.62X51mm in bulk battle packs might only be $8/20 rounds. The upside, of course, is that you generally need a lot less of premium ammo - generally 100 rounds will be fine, provide it is rotated regularly (buy a new box and shoot the box it replaces every 3-6 months). Better if you can afford to stockpile 200 - 250 rounds, of course; ideally you'd want enough to fill every magazine you have and an additional 250 rounds. When you hit the lottery, that is...

I am well aware that handloading overcomes a lot of the expense above; however it is not for everyone (such as your humble host at present time). Revolvers, naturally, have a significant advantage over the semi-autos, as holding onto the brass is much easier and there's no extractors to gouge or otherwise mar the brass upon ejection. For the reloaders, having 1-2K bullets on hand plus enough powder and brass to assemble all into functioning ammunition would probably be a good start. I have no idea what the cost range would be in this case...

So anyways, there are my thoughts on the number of magazines and ammunition the well-stocked gunnie should possess. This is based on what I feel are good numbers, with an eye towards having more than one needs - remember, if you have too many magazines you can sell some; if you have too much ammo you can shoot it.

That is all.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Stayin' Classy...

Rash Of Vandalism Targets Minn. Politicians
MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) ― Vandals defaced the garage at Sen. Norm Coleman's home, his campaign and police said Wednesday.

Five other Minnesota politicians -- including both Republicans and Democrats -- were similarly targeted with vandalism, according to authorities.

Coleman and his wife, Laurie, live in the Crocus Hill neighborhood of St. Paul. Graffiti left on the outside of their garage reads: "U R A criminal resign or else"; "Scum," which is written three times; and "Psalm 2."

No word on whether the handwriting matches that of Al Franken.

(Link found at Hot Air).

That is all.

Happy Blogiversary!

Jeff over at Alphecca is celebrating his blogiversary today. His SIXTH blogiversary.

Six years. That's like 184 IRL years...

Congratulations, Jeff! Here's wishing you (at least) six more!

That is all.

The Funny Bone of the Law

Murphy details a practical joke played on him by a cop buddy. Which, naturally, got me to thinking about some of the cop jokes I've heard about through my dad. Dad G. is a retired MA state cop, as I've probably mentioned a couple of times. Murph's story reminded me of one of the stories my dad tells about one of the many practical jokes he played as a statie.

He spent time in pretty much every corner of MA during his career with the MSP, and did his last tour at Logan Airport. The overnight shift. When everyone is bleary-eyed and half awake. In the late 1970s, long before we had round-the-clock news or the internet or iPhones or any of the other electronic gadgets that help us pass the time while waiting in unfamiliar venues.

So it's about 3 AM, people are snoozing in the hard plastic "Brady Bunch" chairs, when over the loudspeaker comes a message:
"Attention. Attention. This is God. Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest. Thank you."

It took about 5 - 10 minutes before the phone line lit up with a very upset sergeant telling "those [effing] jokers" that they were NOT to torment the travelers...

That is all.

More New Blogs!

Got a couple more blogs to add to the blogroll...

1. Sabra over at Trailer Park Paradise, if for no other reason than I think that's a cool blog name (oh, and she's crazy nice enough to link here).

and

2. Tim at Coin-O. Gee, a bald gun-nut dad biker. Nope. Don't have a thing in common with HIM. Not to mention he e-mailed me to tell me he added me to his blogroll...

Welcome aboard folks!

Now, go make them feel welcome. Go. Read. I'll expect a three page, single-spaced, double-sided report by tomorrow morning...

That is all.

Better Than Coffee...

It's a little-known fact that George Thorogood's cover of Bo Diddley's "Who Do You Love" has been proven to be more effective at waking up sluggish commuters than a cup of coffee.

Plus it doesn't spill all over the console when you hit a pothole.

(It also didn't hurt that they followed it up with "Nobody's Fault"...)

That is all.

Nope, Nothing To See Here...

Just more rampant cheating for Obama is all...

Supreme Court backs Ohio officials in election dispute

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court is backing Ohio elections officials in an ongoing dispute over allegations of voter registration fraud.

The justices in an unsigned opinion Friday blocked a lower court order directing the Ohio Secretary of State -- a Democrat -- to update the state's voter registration database after information provided by some newly registered voters did not match up with Social Security and driver registration numbers.


Nope, just the Secretary of State (who happens to be a Democrat) doing her level best to swing the important state of Ohio to Barack Obama. Nothing to see here, just business as usual. Just elected officials betraying the public trust, once again putting party over fairness. Yawn. Nothing big about that, right?

Certainly not as important as bringing one's daughter to work...

(Side note: I think we need to send the World's Most Dangerous Librarian over to keep Mrs. Brunner on the level...)

That is all.

Isn't It Ironic?

Don'tcha think? That the AP found time to investigate Sarah Palin's travel records as governor of Alaska, digging deep into her tax records to discover that she, {GASP} brought her kids with her, and yet fall over themselves ignoring ACORN's rampant voter fraud?

I mean, it's not the media is actively working to help Obama distance himself from ACORN,right?

Oh, wait, they are.

But Sarah Palin brings her kids on a trip as AK governor, or Joe the Plumber misses a mortgage payment, and it's front page news three days running.

Nope, nothing to see here, folks. Just go about your business and let the media professionals choose who's going to be President. Oh, and while you wait, we'll be serving up yet another "story" about how Sarah Palin is unqualified to be Vice President, yet ignore that she's more qualified than Barack Obama...

This is what passes for "news" these days, eh? Go figure.

That is all.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Unusual...

Ever notice when you blow your nose really hard, you can't hold in a fart? I mean a real, loud, nasty-smelling emanation of sulphurous proportions that normally would cause you to clench your sphincter closed so tight you could convert charcoal to diamond?

Nah, me neither.

That is all.

Thanks, Bruce...

After clicking your damn Lego™ link, I now have to raid my gun fund to buy this for my son for Christmas:


You've just gotta admit this is cool...

That is all.

Happy Birthday!

211 years ago, a legend was launched.

1797: Oct. 21 - Although her construction is almost halted by a 1796 peace treaty with Algiers, USS CONSTITUTION is launched-christened by visiting Capt. James Sever using a bottle of Madeira. It is actually the third attempt to launch her; the first was a month earlier, when the ship sticks after moving only 27 feet. Two days later she moves another 31 feet before sticking once again. For the third attempt, workers make the launching ways steeper, which finally enables a successful event. The public, which includes several French aristocrats, is warned beforehand that the launch of such a large ship might cause a dangerously large wave, but none actually materializes during the
event.
Happy 211st, Old Ironsides.

That is all.

Late to the Party

...Again.

Dunno how I managed to miss this, but hells yeah, I'm in:

Are you a Joe? Say it proud. Leave it on every goddamn newspaper comment section and online forum. Let these pressroom and online thugs know you won't stay silent when they try to destroy the life of a private citizen for speaking his mind -- because for every one of them, there are a million Joe Wurzelbachers. And for that we should all be thankful.
I am Joe. Really, actually. (Jay is derived from Joseph). Joe's also my middle name, just like Joe the plumber. I stand with Joe.

I've written about my disgust with the mainstream media over this story already, so I'll spare the extra vitriol.

Others who are Joe: Ted, Lissa, TOTWTYTR, Dirtcrashr, Pistolero, T-bolt, Traction Control, Linoge, JD, and most likely a whole bunch of other folks I'm currently missing (and humbly apologize for the oversight in advance...) (ETA JD, sorry bud!)

That is all.

Dichotomy...

Why is it that whenever someone says "It's not about the money", it inevitably IS all about the money?

Police in Mass. city would get Sept. 11 pay
PEABODY, Mass. (AP) In what may be a first-of-its kind contract provision, police officers in Peabody will receive holiday pay on Sept. 11.

The new four-year contract between the North Shore city and its police union makes the anniversary of the terrorist attacks a paid holiday, with officers receiving time and a quarter for working on the day.

On the news this morning they were running bullet points about this story where the claim was made that it wasn't about the money.

Well, if it's not about the money, then why time and a quarter?

At a time when state budgets are getting slashed and people are concerned about their jobs, their mortgages, and their retirement funds, for the police department to use September 11th as a bargaining chip for an extra day off or bonus pay is beyond the pale. NYPD doesn't get the day off, and they were on the front lines of 9/11, literally. For the officers of Peabody, MA, a small city with, as far as I can tell, no ties to the events of 9/11 to bargain for the day off is simply unconscionable.

That is all.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Random Ramblings...

The infamous Mr. Blackwell, he of the "Worst-Dressed" list, has died.

The list of suspects is 48 pages long.




Colin Powell has endorsed Barack Obama for President.

Does this mean he's no longer the "house slave" of the Bush Administration?




A Worcester, MA representative got to skip a year's worth of his mortgage payments because the bank contributed to his campaign and received dubious assistance.

Curse you, Bush Administration and your nefarious ties to the banking industry!




Another shooting in Dorchester leaves three pre-teens in the hospital; Mumbles blames... Yes, you guessed it, the gun used in the shooting.

Why does a quote from Archie Bunker spring to mind? Would Mumbles feel better if those kids had been pushed out of windows?




That is all.

My Return...

As I mentioned yesterday, I have rejoined the Catholic Church.

Now, don't take this the wrong way. I'm not going to turn into a holy roller; I'm not going to proselytize; I'm not going to beat all of my guns into plows; I'm still going to be the same profane gun nut biker I've always been. But now I've got a Sunday morning commitment. Hell, the gun club's closed until after lunch; might as well do something with the morning, right? And they've got free coffee and donuts, how cool is that?

Kidding aside, this is something that's been in the works for a long time. I've been, well, pretty much an average Catholic - you know the joke:
A priest, a rabbi, and a minister were having coffee one morning and the subject of pest control in the rectory came up. The rabbi complained because he had to have an exterminator come in to rid the temple of mice, and was concerned about having to kill the animals. The minister agreed, noting that they'd recently had to set traps in the food kitchen to stop the infestations.

The priest clucked his tongue and chided his companions. "Gentleman, I implore you to stop these murderous methods. Surely this cannot be G-d's will, killing his creatures like this."

The minister and the rabbi agreed, but argued that they had tried non-lethal methods with no success. They asked the priest how he managed to keep mice out of the rectory without hurting them.

"It's very easy. I baptize and confirm them, and then I only see them at Christmas and Easter."

Well, I was missing even Christmas and Easter.

It was easy to pass on church growing up; my mom had (has) issues with organized religion in general (which she passed on to her son) that stem from her having grown up during the tumultuous days of Vatican II. She watched her fellow high school students, who happened to live in a different archdiocese that had already ratified the new rules, eat meat on Friday without immediately going to hell, and asked her priest why they could eat meat on Friday and she couldn't. His answer was along the "blind faith" lines, as it's hard to explain why, by virtue of mere geography (some 5 miles as the crow flies and a state line), her consumption of meat on Friday would send her to hell but not her friend from NH.

Dad, well, Dad's in the Knights of Columbus but doesn't attend church either. I've never asked him why; I've always been pretty much the same way; content to sleep in on Sundays (in the past; these days I consider sleeping until 7 AM sleeping in), run errands, or lay on the couch watching cartoons with the kids (which is still a damned good use of my time, no matter how many chores I have on the honey-do list...).

There was never much pressure to attend church; I was told I "had to" when I was a child and attended CCD after mass. I never got a satisfactory answer when I asked, "Well, how come you and mom don't go to church?". Sometimes it's easier to say "Because" than to give an answer. And once I was confirmed, I didn't have to go any more. That suited me just fine.

Well, I didn't want that to be the case with my kids. I didn't want to just roar up in front of the church at 9, drop The Boy off for church and Sunday School, and come back two hours later to retrieve him. I wanted him to see that this was something I felt was important for us to do. I wanted him to see his Dad going to church rather than just telling him he had to go.

I wanted my kids to have a religious upbringing that, at the very least, they could use as a springboard for their own spiritual journey. Sure, the path of least resistance would have been to do nothing; to refrain from sending them to church and CCD based on my distrust of organized religion. But I was raised in the Catholic faith; I'm familiar with the doctrine, the prayers, the routines and rituals; and I wanted my children to be brought up at least to adulthood (in the eyes of the church, that is) with knowledge of some form of faith. I chose Roman Catholicism because it's familiar to me.

Well, something funny happened on the way to my impartial, detached "get the chillens some religious learnin'." I started feeling like I wanted to go back. It felt a little weird, really, celebrating Christmas without acknowledging Christ Himself. I found myself wanting to explain the miracle of Resurrection as the basis for our Easter holiday rather than letting the kids think it had something to do with Lagomorphs who magically laid eggs.

You know what the funniest thing was?

When I talked to the usher upon walking into the church, ostensibly to ask where the Sunday School classes were held, I wound up giving the Reader's Digest condensed version of my religious life story - that I'd grown up a Catholic, lapsed for a bit, but was coming back for my kids.

You'd have thought I handed him the winning Powerball ticket.

Something else interesting happened, too. I saw a good number of people that I recognized (interestingly enough, most from Scouting, go figure). All of them were genuinely happy to see me in church; not a single person questioned why they hadn't seen me before. It was surprisingly refreshing to be accepted without question. I would have bet money going in that I'd have to explain myself a dozen times over. As it was, only our Pack Committee Chairman gave me any grief, and even that was just to rib me about my bald head...

The Boy, BTW, sat through his very first mass in such a grown-up, mature manner that my heart was just bursting with pride at his maturity. Sure, towards the end I got the inevitable "is it almost over, Dad?" - but that was literally 5 minutes before the end of mass. He was respectful (for the most part - he is only seven, after all...), paid attention, and when asked afterwards what he thought told me that he enjoyed it.

Now, I'm not going to say that bells rang, a light shone on me and I did cartwheels through the church. I'm certain that a good portion of my son's behavior springs from the novelty as well as the pleasure of having Dad all to himself (I left BabyGirl G at home because there's enough upheaval in The Boy's day to have to put up with his sister competing for Dad's attention; she'll get her chance soon enough). But we'll be back next week, my son and I. I'm going to give this a second shot.

That is all.

1,000...

Holy crap.

I just noticed, when I went to log in this morning, that I had 1,002 posts to my credit. Three of those are drafts that I need to finish at some point (and one of them is from March of last year, so don't hold your breath...).

That means that, once I hit the "Publish Post" button on this post, I will have offered up my one thousandth brain dropping post.

I wish I had something deep and meaningful to say here. However, it's 6:30 in the morning, I've been up for an hour and a half, and I haven't had any coffee yet... I'll settle for saying thanks for reading, and that I hope to continue doing this for several thousand more posts...

That is all.

Know What This Needs? More Gun Control!

Brother of shooting victim Liquarry Jefferson accepts plea deal
A Roxbury teen who admitted today he brought the handgun into his home that killed his 8-year-old brother Liquarry Jefferson last year has accepted a plea deal that keeps him out of state prison for involuntary manslaughter and lying to police.

Instead, Jayquan McConnico, 16, has agreed to remain in the custody of the Department of Youth Services until he turns 21. A concurrent nine-year probation sentence meted out by Boston Juvenile Court Judge Stephen Limon requires him to earn a high school diploma, then secure full-time employment or attend college.

Let's run down the list of charges this young man should have faced:
  • Involuntary manslaughter.
  • Possession of a firearm without a license.
  • Improper storage of a firearm.
  • Possession of ammunition without a license
  • Mandatory year in jail under Bartley-Fox

To say nothing of the fact that he was prohibited from possessing the handgun in question on two separate fronts - he's got a criminal record, so he cannot own the handgun legally under Federal law; and he's not 21, so he could not own the handgun legally under MA law.

Someone, please, tell me what gun control law could have prevented this?

And then, to top it all off, he gets a slap on the wrist for contributing to his own brother's death. Probation? Now, granted, he's in DYS custody for the next five years; however the Federal firearms charges alone (felon in possession) should be sufficient to hold him indefinitely. What kind of time should he have served?

Had he been convicted by a jury, McConnico faced up to 30 years in state prison.

He committed crimes serious enough to warrant 30 years in jail, and yet he'll spend 5 in juvenile detention then be set free. Let that sink in. This is in MA, land of "the toughest gun laws in the nation" where "You're more likely to live here" (presumably due to the tough gun laws).

Unless, of course, you're some poor child living with gangsters. Then you're SOL.

Someone, please, tell me why we should EVER listen to those that would pass more gun laws. Why? If they are not going to prosecute obvious and clear-cut cases when those gun laws are broken, what possible reason could they have for wanting more laws? Could it possibly be that the real intent behind the gun control movement has nothing to do with reducing crimes committed with fireams, but rather on disarming those that are not inclined to commit crimes in the first place?

I've got a hunch I know the answer. And I don't like what it portends.

That is all.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

In Thirty Minutes...

I return to the Church.

Wish me luck.

That is all.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

MArooned 5-Second Movie Review: Live Free or Die Hard

As I just typed in an e-mail to commenter sci-fi, my review of "Live Free or Die Hard" can be summed up in a single sentence:

If you know nothing about guns, computers, or physics, it's not a bad movie.


It's a fun, shut-your-brain-off action movie. LOTS of willing suspension of disbelief. Stunts are over the top, even for the Die Hard franchise - including a drop onto a Harrier jump jet a la "True Lies"... I thought the ending of Die Hard With a Vengeance - where McClane hits a high tension wire with a snubnosed revolver at ~ 200 feet from a moving heliocopter - was hard to swallow. It's pretty believable compared to some of the stuff in LFoDH.

And what's with the scoped sniper machine guns? Those are so "Last Boy Scout"...

That is all.

Why Do I Shoot?

RobertaX started a meme, albeit inadvertently. She asked her readers:

How about you? Why do you shoot? Why do you carry, if you carry at all?


And I instantly realized that trying to distill my reasons and motivations for shooting and carrying into a comment wasn't going to work; it needed to be its own post.

It's two distinct questions requiring two separate and distinct answers. There's obviously some overlap, as a good portion of my shooting revolves (ha! a gun pun) around training with the guns that I carry; however that's not the only reason why I shoot. I also shoot for recreation and relaxation. I'll cover the two aspects separately.




The training aspect is pretty obvious. It's foolhardy to carry a firearm for personal protection if you're not intimately familiar with how that firearm performs under a myriad of circumstances. How quickly can I get the front sight back on target? How accurate can I be shooting rapid-fire? How startled am I going to be at the report? How is the recoil going to affect my shooting? How well does my firearm perform using specialized ammunition?

All of these questions need to be answered in great detail before the gun should be carried.

The very first question, though, that needs to be answered before one makes the decision to get the permit to carry, is "Am I willing to take the life of another human being in the defense of my own?" This is critical. If the answer to this question is anything other than "yes"; if there is any doubt whatsoever as to one's ability to pull the trigger at the critical moment; then re-think the decision to go armed. That pause can kill.

I've got two beautiful children to protect. There is, quite literally, no doubt in my mind that if someone threatens my kids, I will kill them where they stand. Hell, I nearly slugged the priest who baptized my son just because he made my son cry... (I'm fairly certain you go straight to hell, do not pass go, for hitting a priest...) I've also seen the elephant - I've been threatened with deadly force and made the decision to fight before, and that was unarmed.

So, this decision has been made. What to do next? Well, you train. You pick out which firearm works best for you as a carry weapon (right now I'm down to five. No, I'm not kidding) and train, train, train. You practice your draw. You dry-fire. You train with that weapon until it becomes an extension of your very hand. And you shoot it. A lot. You make sure you're proficient with it at across-the-room distances (typically between 7 - 10 yards), although it's never a bad idea to test your accuracy at longer distances from time to time (50 feet - 25 yards).

Two of my carry weapons are revolvers - a shrouded hammer S&W model 38 for pocket carry, and a Chief's Special .357 magnum S&W 360PD - these are slightly less finicky about ammo than the semi-automatics, so I spend more time shooting the pistols than the wheelguns. However, even at that, it's still a good idea to pick up a J-frame and bring it to the range every now and again... The snubbie is a very difficult handgun to master, and requires specialized attention compared to a larger revolver (I have Hogue bantam Monogrips on both J-frames for easier concealment, which means the grip is different than for the larger guns, for one example).

The other three carry weapons are semi-automatic pistols - the Kel Tec P3AT 380, the S&W SW99compact 9mm, and the Glock G30 45 ACP. All three are routinely shot with FMJ ammo as well as the JHP that I rely on for protection; all three weapons will load, feed, and fire all ammo reliably (not a single FTF on any gun yet; the SW99C has shot literally thousands of rounds). For the semi-automatics, it's important to gauge the trigger reset; to retain the proper grip so as to avoid "limp-wristing" which can lead to failures to load; and other minuscule differences over the revolvers. I try to mix up my defensive shooting drills to include at least one revolver and one semi-auto whenever possible.




Training for self-defense isn't fun, though. You're shooting at a paper target that, for all intents and purposes, represents another human being.

You're training to kill.

And that's a sobering thought. Yes, I know; we're shooting to "stop the threat", and that's all that ever need said should the fecal matter impact the oscillating air control device. But what's more stopped than dead? You are training to put your shots into an area that will cause the most damage in the quickest amount of time - center of mass - so that your attacker will be sufficiently debilitated that he cannot continue his aggression.

Like I said, not fun.

What is fun, though, is an afternoon spent shooting orange clays on the 25 yard berm with a good friend. Taking a $50 pump-action .22LR caliber rifle, loading it up with cheap .22 ammo out of a bulk box from Wal-Mart, and handing it to a new shooter to get them hooked? Pure bliss. Blasting the holy hell out of a keyboard with a 12 gauge shotgun loaded with birdshot? Oh hell yeah, that's a good time right there. We won't even get into the zen-like experience of redneck trap...

There's a lot of fun to be had while shooting.

And it's not just the actual sending downrange of lead - the camaraderie at the range is second-to-none. I've had complete strangers offer me their finely-tuned, highly-expensive race guns to shoot simply because I complimented their choice of firearm. I've met some of the greatest people through my shooting experience, and any attempt to list them all would fall short. Suffice to say, the shooting community is extremely gracious, giving, and caring. Certainly not the knuckle-dragging neanderthals we're painted as in the media, but I digress...

Inasmuch as shooting is fun, for me it's also a form of relaxation. I enjoy going to the gun club for the afternoon and spending a leisurely hour or two on the rifle range sighting in a new scope, or testing out new ammo, or just seeing if I can possibly shrink my grouping a little more. I'll go to the pistol range and blast away with a .357 Magnum or .45 ACP or hot 9mm loads when the stress of the workweek has me knotted up with tension.

And every single time, I get into the truck after a session at the range feeling calm, serene, and definitively unstressed...

As I've put it: "It's impossible to be stressed out when you're shooting a Magnum caliber handgun." I've said it half-kidding, but really, it's true. You can't be tense when you're sending 158 grains of .357 Magnum goodness downrange at 1300 FPS... I've explained it to Mrs. G as "this is my therapy". It's a hobby, yes. It's a dedication that could potentially save my life, yes. But, really, in the grand scheme of things, I shoot mainly because it relaxes me and gives me an outlet for stress relief. And it's a lot of fun.

And that's what it's all about, really.

That is all.

They Say It's Your Birthday!

Hey hey kids!

Today is a certain Ambulance Driver's birthday.

Go wish him a happy happy. And be nice - this is the big 4-0.

Yeah, I know. I thought he was older, too...

(Just funnin' ya, big guy!)

Happy Birthday Ambulance Driver!

That is all.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Friday Motorhead Fun Thread!

Let's see... We've done the good, the bad, and the ugly cars of the 1980s... The good cars of the 1990s... I think it's time to go a little further back this week. This week, we catalog...

The good American cars of the 1970s.

This is going to be a very difficult list to compile. I was a child of the 1970s, so these truly are the cars of my childhood, the first automobiles with which I have some real connection. The 1970s were a real Jekyll & Hyde period for the American automobile industry. It started strong, with the muscle car craze of the 1960s still fanning the displacement wars, but ended weak, with mandatory emissions and CAFE standards choking the very cubic inches out of them.

There was also a little matter of gas shortages and embargoes that brought about a laughable first attempt at "smaller" American cars - however, it also brought about a tidal wave of smaller, better-made foreign cars. For the first time, Americans started looking at smaller cars as gas lines grew and 8 MPG behemoths lost their luster. The first attempts were truly pathetic, cars so poorly-made that it can only be assumed that the American automotive industry was actively trying to dissuade people from buying them...

But there were some seriously awesome cars. This is that list.

1. 1970 Pontiac GTO - 455 CI engine. 360 BHP. A blistering 500 ft.lbs. of torque. Insert Tim Allen "Tim the Toolman Taylor"-esque grunt here. This is in the top three of my ultimate favorite cars EVAH. Of course, it doesn't hurt that it's only one of GM's mighty quartet of muscle cars: Pontiac GTO Judge, Chevrolet Chevelle SS, Buick GSX, and Oldsmobile 442. These cars weren't made of win, they were made of cubic inches...

2. 1970 Plymouth AAR Barracuda - All American Racing. 'Nuff said. The AAR 'Cuda was only manufactured in 1970 as a special edition racing edition. The fiberglass hood (weight reduction), side exhaust, and custom graphics truly set this apart from other Baracudas; the 340 cubic inch motor with "six pack" (triple two-barrel carbs) offered 290 HP and 14.5 second quarter mile times. It wasn't as fast as the Hemi 'Cuda (with 425 HP and 14.0 second ¼ mile time!), but the limited edition gets the slot on the list.

3. 1971 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray - last year of big block 454 power. Classic "Mako Shark" styling cues. The third generation Corvette body also happens to be my personal favorite... There's something about that body style that just screams fast, even when it's sitting still. Bonus points, too, for the side pipes - the 'Vette had side pipes well over a decade before the Viper...

4. 1976 Cadillac El Dorado - "the last American convertible". Not only that, but it had the cachet of being the car favored by Boss Hogg - nothing like cheesy '80s TV show nostalgia to get a car on the list... Not to mention it's hard not to like a car that's so large that helicopters routinely land on the trunk...

5. 1978 Dodge Lil Red Express Truck - The 1970s saw ever-increasing regulations on the automotive industry as the first ham-handed attempts to curb vehicular emissions and improve gas mileage were implemented. There was a loophole, though - light trucks were (originally) exempt from these new regulations*, and Dodge stuffed a high performance police package 360 CI motor into a short wheelbase D-150, slapped high-rise stack dual exhaust coming out of the (wood-floored) bed, gave it a bright red paint job, and the Lil Red Express Truck was born. The first "boutique" truck definitely makes the list.

6. 1971 Ford Mustang Mach I - With the 429 Cobra Jet engine powering the "Clydesdale" Mustang (given the car's bloated size compared to the "pony" Mustang of the 1960s...) and 370 horsepower at the beck and call of the driver, Ford had a muscle car that could match the 440 CI Trans Am.

7. International Scout II - (1979 pictured) Just weird enough to make the list; the International Harvester (yes, THAT International Harvester!) Scout II was built to compete with the Willy's Jeep for the off-road enthusiast community. That alone gets it a spot. That it was put out by a manufacturer of heavy-duty farm equipment is just the icing on the oddball cake... Oh, and I knew this girl in college who owned one... (memreeez...)

8. 1971 Ford Thunderbird - what a difference a decade makes. I listed the 1980 T-bird on my list of Ugliest Cars of the 1980s, yet the 1971 T-bird makes the "Best" list for the 1970s. Go figure. Well, that's what clean lines and a 429 cubic inch motor will do compared to a box shape and a tired 302 (Which was the BIGGEST option in 1980!)...

9. 1971 AMC Javelin AMX - (1974 shown) this is a quirky addition; something a little out of the mainstream, but I just had to give something to AMC for taking a moment away from making the world's ugliest cars to produce a somewhat decent looking muscle car with a respectable 401 cubic inch V8 engine...

10. Custom vans. I had an uncle who had a custom Dodge van in the 1970s. I thought it was the single coolest thing I'd ever seen. Guess that's why I have a soft spot to this day for wild and crazy custom vehicles. Plus I must have seen "The Van" about 500 times on late-night TV... So here's a relevant clip:






So there's my list of my favorite top ten cars of the 1970s. Please feel free to debate/critique/add your own personal favorites in comments.

That is all.

*side note: This is one of the reasons I get so pissed off when people try to slam the auto industry for "pushing" SUVs on the American people as some sort way "around the rules". Folks, light trucks have had different regulations for DECADES. Deal with it.

Positively Chilling...

There is an all-out full-court press to destroy "Joe the Plumber" in the mainstream media.

Joe the Plumber's tale has a few leaks

'Joe the plumber' isn’t licensed

Reality Checking "Joe The Plumber"

Joe the Plumber may not be Joe, and he may need a provisional ballot

Joe The 'Not Registered' Plumber Owes Back Taxes

Joe the Plumber? Not a plumber. And not even called Joe

An average guy absolutely DESTROYED in the media because he dared to question The One. Folks, this is beyond the pale. Within the span of a week, we know more about "Joe the Plumber" than we do Barack Obama. We know that Joe hasn't paid some back taxes - but we don't know about Obama's college transcripts. We know that Joe isn't his given name, yet we don't know the full extent of Obama's involvement with the Joyce Foundation or ACORN. All because he dared to ask a single question of Barack Obama, a question that was ultimately used against Obama.

The average joe dared take on The One, and the average joe got slimed.

That's chilling. Only those with absolutely nothing to hide dare speak out in today's brave new world of personal destruction. How can your average person hope to stand such scrutiny? Well, that's an easy one: Only speak out against Republicans.

Just imagine, will you, if the mainstream media devoted this much time and effort into looking into the massive voter fraud perpetuated by ACORN. Or did a little legwork to fill in the missing gaps in Obama's resume - where he was on the board of directors of the Joyce Foundation that no one wants to talk about. Or, perhaps, brings up the many publications to Obama's credit as President of the Harvard Law Review. Surely the media could find us that. Heck, just filling in his academic credentials between the time he graduated high school and finished at Harvard would be nice - given that they were able to get us George W. Bush's college grades at breakneck speed...

You know, actual journalism - that DIDN'T benefit Barack Obama, that is.

Sickening. I have a horrible feeling that the Obama Administration is going to make us long for the even political keel of the Clinton Administration...

That is all.

Friday Gun Pr0n #81

Today's gun pr0n is a departure from the past couple of weeks' worth of large-bore semi-automatics.




That's a Remington Model 511 Scoremaster magazine-fed bolt-action .22 caliber rimfire rifle. It's got a Tasco Silver Antler 3-9X scope sitting on top, and is currently dialed in at 50 yards. At that distance it's good for minute-of-chipmunk or better, capable of putting all 6 shots in a 2" circle (or better, more than likely, in the hands of a more skilled rifleman than your humble host).

It's a really fun little rifle, great for spending some quality time plinking cans or picking off clays at the 50 yard berm. With practice (and a more powerful scope) I'd wager it would be just as accurate on the 100 yard berm, but even with 9X total magnification my eyesight's limited to the 50 yard stop. One of these days I want to fine-tune the scope settings at 50 yards with some quality .22LR ammo (any suggestions on good stuff?) and see if I can't shrink the groups some more...

The best part about this rig? The cost. The entire set-up - rifle, scope, and two magazines - has set me back a staggering $11. The rifle was a generous gift from a friend of my dad's who was retiring and moving to Florida and didn't want the hassle of traveling with firearms. He had this Remington, a no-name knock-off of a Baby Browning .25 ACP, and a Harrington & Richardson Sportsman .22 revolver, all of which he graciously traded to me in exchange for lunch! The scope was a generous give-away from Milsurps4Me on the Northeastshooters forum (thanks buddy). The only cost was the shipping of the scope ($5) and the extra six-round magazine ($6 and change with my dealer discount at MidwayUSA).

Sometimes, baby Vulcan not only smiles on you, he laughs at your good fortune.

That is all.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

All I'm Gonna Say...

...is that tomorrow cannot come soon enough...

That is all.

Disappointing The Boy...

Last month I wrote about how proud I was of my son when we attended the Kittery Trading Post outdoor expo and he rattled off the Four Rules before shooting a BB gun at the Crosman booth. He got a Crosman baseball cap for his excellent recitation of the Four Rules from the Crosman rep, and made his dad proud.

Well, this morning he wanted to wear that hat to school, and I had to tell him he couldn't.

I didn't want to get that call. The call that told me my son has gotten in trouble for bring a weapon-related article to school. I'm not certain that the school would do that, mind you; I've got an inkling, in that he was told not to wear his Excalibur t-shirt (from the hotel in Las Vegas) because it had a weapon on it (Excalibur, naturally). So there's some precedent that the school has a zero tolerance policy.

How do you explain that to a seven year old? How do you tell him that he can't wear his favorite hat to school? How do you explain the absolute sheer idiocy behind a mindset that says a freaking company logo makes an article of clothing inappropriate? How do you defend the concept that some people are so petrified of anything that even remotely resembles a gun that they would ban a damned hat with a BB gun company logo?

I sure as hell can't.

And it pisses me off that I had to tell my son he couldn't wear his hat to school. Fortunately, he took it in stride - he has a habit of forgetting his jackets/sweatshirts/hats/gloves/etc., so I prodded him that way ("You don't want to lose your favorite hat, do you?"). But dammit, it pissed me off that some people's hoplophobia prevents my son from wearing his favorite hat...

That is all.

Here's A Shock...

Poll: Debate watchers say Obama wins

HEMPSTEAD, New York (CNN) -- A majority of debate watchers think Sen. Barack Obama won the third and final presidential debate, according to a national poll conducted right afterward.

Fifty-eight percent of debate watchers questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll said Democratic candidate Obama did the best job in the debate, with 31 percent saying Republican Sen. John McCain performed best.


58% to 31%? On. What. PLANET?

Apparently Barack Obama could have walked out onto the stage buck nekkid, covered in jello, and yodeled the Latvian National Anthem for 90 minutes and been declared the winner by the mainstream media. To those of us who actually watched the debate, though, we saw a man clearly outclassed by his opponent. He "uhh"'d his way through the debate, alternating between looking bored and/or irritated at the entire process.

Whereas McCain came out swinging, staying on-message and taking carefully aimed critical potshots at Obama throughout the night. Obama dodged questions - notice he never answered if Sarah Palin were qualified to be President, for example - whereas McCain answered straight back. "I'm not Bush" was probably McCain's most memorable quote from the night, but he had a number of hard-hitting jabs that clearly rattled Obama.

He's not used to that kind of treatment - he is The One, after all. People don't expect him to provide actual answers, you know...

So, yawn, the MSM declares Obama the winner by a preposterous margin. Whatever. I could vote for the John McCain I saw last night. It's a shame that he chose three weeks before the election to finally unveil this side.

That is all.

Full Moon...

Both kids were certifiably insane all day yesterday. Mrs. G. and I just chalked it up to them being kids, and coming off a long weekend, etc. Then I called sci-fi last night before the debate. He mentioned that his kids were bouncing off the walls. I thought it was odd, that both sets of kids were going nuts.

Then I looked outside. Sure enough, bright as daylight. It was a full moon the previous evening. Sure explained the kids. Now, sure, some eggheads claim there's no correlation between the full moon and human behavior. These people have never met my children. Specifically, they've never been subjected to my children during a full moon.

Granted, the kids can drive me nuts regardless of the phase of the moon; hell, it's their job. If my kids were to suddenly start behaving perfectly, minding their manners and not interrupting, helping out around the house, keeping their rooms clean, etc. I'd most likely have them tested for drugs. Finding none, I'd probably offer them some. They're kids. Their job is to bounce off the walls. That's what they do - remind us that we are old and much closer to dying than they are...

But it seems worse when the moon is full. The scientist in me knows that the two events have nothing to do with each other; that I only notice their behavior during the full moon because of the moon itself (my very on Heisenberg effect!). Besides, who am I to argue with Warren Zevon?






That is all.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Live Blogging Presidential Debate #3

Okay. Here we are. Third and final debate. McCain really needs to hit this one out of the park - some polls (okay, NYT) put Obama up by as much as 14%. He needs to be on focus, on the top of his game, and he needs to rattle Obama. Hard. He needs to make the case that Barack Obama is too liberal, too inexperienced, and too beholden to radical groups to be President.

I don't see it happening.

I haven't seen it yet. I've seen Bob Dole, part deux this entire campaign. Obama's got a veritable truckload of material to use against him: Fannie Mae execs on his campaign; money given to ACORN for voter fraud; virulently anti-gun; Tony Resko; etc. And yet McCain choses to harp on stupid stuff.

Meanwhile, Obama has sat back, claimed McCain is the third Bush term, and let the media cover his ass completely. This is apparent to anyone without an agenda. So McCain has to work three times as hard - instead, he's just rolling over and dying. Just like Dole. Or GHWB in 1992.

John McCain, I implore you. Do not repeat the mistakes of those failed campaigns. Please do not give us President Barack Obama...

And now, for the debate. I'm setting up this post with 10-minute increments and will try to place my comments accordingly. Since comments are automatically dated, they should mesh. Somewhat...

Here we go!


Pre-debate: Opening this up 15 minutes before the start. Got the laptop ready. TV on and tuned to Fox News. Gonna call sci-fi in about 10 minutes. Let's get it on!

...

Five minutes until we start the debate. This is going to be... interesting...


9:00 PM: Here we go...

Holy crap, Schieffer looks like "an old apple" (sci-fi)

(he quantifies, "a nice old apple")

And, once again, Obama gets first intro...

Gee, didn't see that coming. More economy.

Just for once, I'd like to see someone mention, oh, rampant ACORN voting fraud or 8 years on the Board of Directors for the Joyce Foundation...

UGH. I was hoping McCain was going to stop pushing the socialism. Guess not. The gov's going to swoop in and save us from our bad decisions.

Not exactly giving me reason to vote for you, John...

And Obama's turn...

Oh, not this tax break shit again. Barry, it's your party's high taxes that force companies overseas to begin with. John, please hit him with this. NAFTA???

"Our energy policy is giving our wealth away"????

Bringing up the plumber... Interesting... I didn't see that coming.


9:10 PM: Weer'd points out that Barry's hitting the "uh"s awfully early...

YES!!! "We need to spread the wealth around"... WHAMMO!

John, if you want to deflate Barry's "95% get a tax break", mention that the first 45% don't pay taxes in the first place.

Then follow up by asking where he's going to get the money for his new programs with only the top 5% having increases...

Did Obama just say he didn't want to pay taxes? I hear there's no taxes in Communist countries, since the government owns all the money...

Obama? Specifics? Apparently Bob didn't get the memo that we are not to question The One...

Obama's spending cuts. Right. Say goodbye to the US military, folks...

AUGH! The government has no business doing JACK SHIT about home values, John!!!


9:20 PM: Whoa. Obama didn't look happy when they panned over to him...

Earmarks... They need to be eliminated. JOHN... Please point out to Barry how many earmarks YOU have had, vs. his number...

(from b, sci-fi's better half: McCain is doing well tonight. I concur).

OUCH! Let's look at our records, Senator Obama. HAMMER TIME!

Where has this John McCain been so far this campaign???

What does tort reform or charter schools have to with balancing budgets or cutting spending?

sci-fi points out that it only took 23 minutes for Obama to take a swipe at Fox.

8 more years of the same? He's giving McCain a lot of credit there...

"Your record of standing up to the leaders of your party isn't convincing" WHAM!!!

He ***DID*** "pal around with terrorists". UGH.

Comparatively speaking, McCain is ON FIRE tonight...

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was hoping McCain would HAMMER Obama for that bit from Lewis...

Wow. McCain is bringing out the BIG hammer tonight... Holy crap...

I GUARAN-FUCKING-TEE Obama will be called the winner of this debate, too...

And Barry's response? 3 minutes of "uh".

100% have been negative. That's going to be tough to prove, Barry.

We can debate health care or the economy. Just not anything that makes me look bad, like foreign policy or gun control...


9:30 PM: NO SHIT you want to see the next three weeks focusing on the economy. The media's already assured that's gonna happen.

McCain's back on the attack, and he's doing it in a slick, careful way. WHY has he waited until now???? Why hasn't this John McCain been running the whole time???

OH WAH! Poor Barry and those eeeevil racist Republicans.

Don't laugh, John... It wicked looks bad...

OOH! McCain goes to bat for the people at the rallies... Whoa... NOTICE that McCain does NOT throw his supporters under the bus when the going gets tough. {cough}{cough}Jeremiah Wright...

And he tosses it back at Obama. Good.

Wow, could Obama look more smug? Is that even possible?

Why not just say worst financial crisis in the history of Western Civilization? It's not like the media is going to, you know, investigate your claim...

ACORN!!! YES!!!! Voter fraud!! NAILED!!! John McCain just PWNED Barry!!!!

And Barry's response?

Apparently what they've done? THE DALLAS FUCKING COWBOYS were registered in LAS VEGAS!

Uh, Barry? Weren't you employed by ACORN??? As a trainer of some sort? What, exactly, did you train people to do?

YES! Board of the Woods foundation with Ayers!


9:40 PM: Joe... Biden... is "one of the finest" public servants?!?!?!?

Was Joe "fighting for the little guy" when he penned the idiotic Assault Weapons Ban?

Energy Independence has been languishing since Barry was a pimply faced teenager, but he's all of a sudden going to get it going???

YES. Bring up Sarah's record... That's enough.

Special needs children. Good response, John.

"She's uh obviously uh a {pause}..." Barry's rattled...

Notice Obama didn't answer the question as to whether Palin was qualified - he went off on the "spending cuts will stop all research" tangent...

That entire question was quoted from a T. Boone Picken's commercial... (sci-fi)

Reduce foreign oil - eliminate ME oil and Venezuelan oil. I like that plan, John... More nuclear plants, good.

PLEASE bring up Cape Wind and Kennedy's opposition... Oh well...

Off to Barry... He STARTS by changing the question. Odd. How many "THE most important issue"s does this make now?

I think we need to worry more about poisoned baby formula from China than oil, but that's just me...


9:50 PM: Is Barry honestly claiming that South Korea is not importing more American cars because of TARIFFS??? SRSLY?

And could someone please bring up WHICH PRESIDENT signed NAFTA into law AFTER browbeating us for MONTHS about how needed it was???

Wow, it's a good thing I'm not doing a shot every time Barry says "uh"...

And ANOTHER "highest priority".

WHAMMO!!! Nailed on Chavez!!! Heh.

Gee, the government did such a great fucking job with the mortgage and banking industry, we really want them handling our health care, don't we?

John, please tell me you've looked up MA and Deval's mandatory health care and the associated cost overruns...

McCain response... Escalating costs... Not health care centers and online records, John!

Is it just me, or does McCain seem to be losing steam? I think it's past his bedtime...


10:00 PM: And he brings back Joe the plumber! Wow!

YES! He brings up mandatory health care... and mentions fines.

WHAMMO! Single payer... And England and Canada.

Wait a minute. Isn't it already law that large companies have to provide health care??? Maybe that's just MA...

Hey! McCain just pointed out that the Democrats are in charge of Congress. Haven't had that pointed out much these days. The only way it could have been better would have been for McCain to point out that the same Congress has single-digit approval ratings...

And onto abortion and the litmus test for the USSC. Interesting. McCain says no.

WHAT did McCain just say? The decision should rest in the states? What kind of dangerous subversive thinking is THAT??? BAM!!! Hits Barry AGAIN! Body blow! Body blow! Finish him off!

Careful, John. When President Obama nominates Hillary! as USSC Chief Justice you may have to eat those words...

Roe vs. Wade was rightly decided? Of course - if you believe that the fedgov should trump the state at all issues...

NAIL HIM. Our second amendment rights MOST CERTAINLY are relegated to the state level. Ask him if IL's refusal to grant CCW should be overturned by the feds...


10:10 PM: Oh man... McCain's going there... Wow... The born-alive vote... And follows it up with voting "present". WHAM!

And he hits Obama AGAIN for voting "present". YES!!!!!! Damn!

WHERE HAS THIS JOHN MCCAIN BEEN?!?!?!?!?!

Obama's mad. Wow. He voted for it before he voted against it. Ah. Yes, ask John Kerry how that worked for him... And if it was already law, why couldn't you vote for the next one?

OBAMA WILL BAN ABORTION!

There ***WAS*** an exception for the mother. That's the single most pernicious lie about partial birth abortion...

Did he just say that "sexuality is sacred"??? ORLY?

McCain brings up his adopted daughter. Wow. Didn't see that coming!

Last question? I have 10:15 on my clock; is it going to take that long?

Education. Yet another debate come and gone with no mention whatsoever of gun control...

And Obama's solution? Throw more money at the teachers (unions). Wow. How innovative. If only that hadn't been the boilerplate Democratic response since, oh, the turn of the last century....

What the heck did he just say about having a mortgage before you buy a house? I missed it...

Did Barack Obama just say parents should take responsibilty?

And did he say turn off video games? Like the ones he's advertising in?

McCain hitting school choice. Good. COMPETITION. Yes. That's what is needed. Bring up MERIT pay and I'll be happy...

Throwing money - YES! The worst systems get the most money - that is DEFINITELY true in MA - check out what each town spends on students. Now look up performance, let's say, graduation rates. Pick a few towns and see how spending correlates to graduation.

Here's a hint. The towns that spend the most don't graduate the most. Lawrence is the single worst city - 40.8% graduate rate. They spend in the top 10% per pupil, though.

Money is not the answer.


10:20 PM: Okay, went off on a tangent there. Missed a chunk there, but it sounded a lot like Obama just advocated throwing more money at the problem.

And McCain SLAMS Obama yet again...


10:30 PM: Final statements...

McCain: Hitting reform. Good. CFR. Bad. Careful steward of tax dollars. Good.

Stop spending. Also good, but will be used against him.

Trust. Ouch... Pushing service, good.

And Obama's turn. Hits the economy again. Last 8 years. Blah blah blah.

Worst economic crisis EVAH. And yet, the Democratically controlled Congress has done nothing.

Anytime a Democrat says "tax cuts for the middle class", my wallet hurts...

Then again, I remember the Cellucci/Harshbarger campaign, where Harshbarger's definition of a "rich" person was a family making over $27K a year (in Massa-fucking-chusetts)...


Post-debate: Wow. Why haven't this John McCain sooner? Why? For the love of G-d, please let this John McCain stay on the trail and not the frail old dude in the last campaign...

McCain is CLEARLY the winner IMHO. He hammered Obama on key points, countered Obama's attacks successfully, and made good, strong points for himself.

However, I don't think it was enough to help him very much. Had we seen this John McCain at all three debates, though, we'd have a completely different race today...

And Bill Kristol brings up an excellent point - Bill Clinton promised a "middle class tax cut" and then delivered a tax hike...


Okay. I think that's enough for tonight.

That is all.

One Last Time, Into the Breach...

Yes, I will be live-blogging the third and final Presidential Debate tonight.

I'm curious to see just how slanted the coverage will be. After all, this is McCain's debate to lose...

9:00 PM. I'll be here. Laptop at the ready. Longtime friend and political ally sci-fi on the bat-phone.

Tune in. Have a laugh at my pathetic attempts at humor. Or simply commiserate as we watch the wheels come off the bus...

That is all.

Old School...

We're taking some technological steps backwards here in the G. household...

I've talked about the new laptop we got recently. So far, that seems to be working fine (fingers crossed). It's the old computer that's been giving us trouble, a P4 machine running Win XP Pro that we've had for close to six years now. First it started freezing up, then the monitor went kablooie.

And now the wireless keyboard has given up the ghost.

So, as it stands right now, only the CPU from the new old computer is left. The 19" monitor is gone, replaced with the 15" monitor from the old old computer (HP from 1998). And now, ditto the keyboard - the space age MS wireless ergonomic keyboard has been replaced with the wired HP keyboard that came with the HP Pavilion some 10 years ago.

Talk about a trip down Amnesia Lane!

Keys that actually clack! Keys that actually... respond! (The battery compartment in the wireless MS keyboard had come a little loose, so the batteries weren't actually, you know, powering the keyboard. I could probably pull it apart and fix it, but it will be far more gratifying to bring this keyboard to the next shoot and blast it to bits...)

So we've got six year old technology feeding the internet to me, displaying on a 10 year old monitor and accepting input from a 10 year old keyboard. Gotta give props to HP for the peripherals at least. This stuff works. Even though it's been stuffed in a corner and left to the ages, it works just fine all cleaned up...

That is all.

WCS* Wish List

*Worst Case Scenario, i.e. Obama steals enough votes cheats wins November 4th.

I'm not quite ready to throw in the towel, but I can distinctly hear the fat lady warming up in the wings. Barring some miraculous outbreak of, you know, actual fairness and real journalism (not bloodly likely), it appears that Barack "ACORN" Obama will be our next president.

Given that the Senate and House will most likely not only stay in Democratic control, but become even more further such entrenched, it's time to start thinking about the Wish List. The Firearm Acquisition Wish List. With Barack "Bring Back The Assault Weapon Ban" Obama wielding the Executive Order pen, Nancy "Botox" Pelosi riding herd over Congress and Harry "Deer in the headlights" Reid in the Senate, I think we can safely count on a return to the bad ol' Clinton years of persecution of lawful gun owners.

The most visible target, IMHO, is the Assault Weapon Ban. Some version thereof has been filed every year since the original expired, and handing full control of the government to the Socialist bastards who pioneered gun grabbing is only going to empower them to push the envelope. I think a renewed, non-expiring, and further-reaching ban is not merely a possibility, but a foregone conclusion.

Therefore... It's time to make a list and check it twice. This will be a tiered list, with the most important first and heading downwards from there. The first tier will be the absolute must-haves; the second list to be filled only when all items on the first list acquired; and the third list to be started after the second, although the second list need not be filled to start the third...

All guns to be purchased from a licensed dealer with full paperwork - I am not entirely convinced that they won't try some sort of confiscation this time. After the travesty of New Orleans, where the "law" went door-to-door taking people's lawfully owned weapons away - and nary a single jackbooted thug was challenged - I fear they've developed a taste for confiscation. If so, they'll get these guns. At a price - well above market value...





Top Tier: Most important.


AR-15 variant. From what I've heard, Bushmaster makes a decent rifle. Since I'm in MA, where the original AWB still applies, I'll have to forgo the bayonet lug, collapsible stock, etc. Expected cost: $800 - $1200. 6-12 pre-ban 30 round magazines, est. $120 - $250.

Semi-auto AK-47 clone. Most likely a converted high-cap WASR-10 or SAR-1 if I can find one. Expected cost: $400 - $500. 6 pre-ban 30-round magazines, est. $100.

Really, these are the only two firearms that I really need to get before any sort of ban were in place. I've got plenty of pistols, and "high-capacity" magazines, at least enough for what I want.

Second Tier: Still important, but 1st tier to be filled first.

Bolt-action .50 BMG rifle, a la Serbu. If the AWB doesn't happen, they'll push for the .50 cal to become an NFA item. Est. $2,000.

Additional SKS. Two. One will remain in cosmolene. Est. $200 each, $400 total.

Glock 17. Good to have at least one high-capacity polymer 9mm. $450 est. Add in 4-6 pre-ban 17 round magazines, $100-$120.

Semi-auto .308. FN/FAL, M1A, AR-10, etc. This one should be further down the list than it is, since I have the VEPR, but a magazine-fed semi-auto firearm with only one five-round magazine isn't the most effective battle rifle. The Saiga-308 would be the best option, starting at ~ $400; the M1A the most elegant, but also the most expensive, around $1200 - $1500. Plus 6-8 magazines for whichever option is chosen.

Saiga-12. With as many 8 round magazines as I can find.

M1 Carbine. Manufacturer irrelevant. Already have a boatload of absolute pre-ban magazines. Est. $500.

Third Tier. Everything else.

More high capacity 9mm pistols - Beretta 92, S&W Model 59, etc. Plus magazines for each.

Factory 12 gauge pump-action shotgun with 8-round magazine.

Duplicate AR-15/AK-47 clone - following the "two is one, one is none" principle.

Extra "large capacity" magazines for every semi-automatic firearm I own, and a handful of mags for guns I don't own but might conceivably come across in the future.

Ammo. Lots and lots and lots of ammo...




Well, that's all I can come up for now. I'm sure I'm forgetting quite a few evil rifles and/or pistols that the gun-grabbing a-holes want to ban; please feel free to suggest your own favorite EBR or pistol you think might be banned and should therefore make the list...

That is all.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

So Let's See...

We've got Florida registering felons in violation of their own laws.

We've got ACORN filing false voter registration in multiple states.

And here are CNN's top political stories:

CNNMoney: Bush plans to pump billions into banks
Brown: So what if Obama was a Muslim or an Arab?
Lawmaker seeks probe after own affair alleged
Palin aides warned in trooper feud, report says
Berlusconi brings down the house -- and podium
Borger: Money woes make attacks less salient
House GOP objects to spending in stimulus package
Wall: Obama and Bush not so far apart
Zelizer: Will 'intellectual' label hurt Obama?

Interesting. Not a mention of rampant voter fraud to be found. Notice, though, that the non-story "Troopergate" is the fourth link...

But there's no bias. Go figure.

That is all.

Six Years Too Early...

We inherited a living room set from my sister over the weekend. This set, while the same age as the set it replaces, has spent the last 10 out of its 13 years with my single, high-powered Boston attorney sister. In other words, it hasn't had two small people actively trying to destroy it for nearly 8 years...

The only drawback was that she owns a cat, to which both Mrs. G and I are allergic. The set spent the weekend in our garage awaiting decontamination (extensive vacuuming and de-cat-stink-ifying), which I finally got to this afternoon. Finally got the new set all cleaned up and in place, and The Boy was the first to test it out.

He immediately morphed into a teenager:




What a ham. This kid's illegal in any country under sharia law...

That is all.

BIG Shock...

Hold onto your seats, folks. There's news afoot that's so shocking I'm almost afraid to post it.

I mean it. This news could shake the foundations of life as we know it. It could rival the Segway in how it changes day-to-day life, it's that shocking and surprising.

Are you ready? Do you have your smelling salts handy? 9-1-1 on speed dial at the ready to summon professional help?

Okay. Here goes...

The Boston Globe has endorsed Barack Obama for president

I know, I know. It was a real toss-up as to who the Globe would endorse, especially in light of their fair and impartial coverage of the race to date...

That is all.

New Feature: MArooned Meals!

I'm going to try something new today. I'm going to post a recipe, possibly the first in a series, of a quick and easy meal I like to make that's a hit with the kids. I call it:

The Hurried Dad's Quick 'N' EZ Chicken Cacciatore.




Prep time: 5 minutes.

Cook time: 25 minutes

Total calories: 2,700

Servings: 6-8




Ingredients:

Perdue Short Cuts Chicken, Traditional, cut into 1" pieces

Pound of pasta, shape of choice

2 bags frozen Italian Vegetables (broccoli, cauliflower, beans, carrots, etc.)

2 28 ounce cans Diced Tomatos

1 6 ounce can Tomato Paste




Preparation:

Cook pasta as directed.

Cook frozen vegetables until warm.

Mix Diced Tomatoes, Tomato Paste, and chicken in large mixing bowl.

Add spices to taste:

  • Garlic

  • Parsley

  • Oregano

  • Onion Powder

  • Italian Seasoning

  • Salt/pepper


Warm in microwave five minutes.

Combine with vegetables, mix thoroughly. Heat 4 minutes in microwave.


Serve:


This is a kid favorite - even BabyGirl G, the epitome of "fussy eater", will clean her plate and ask for seconds...


Enjoy!

That is all.

Monday, October 13, 2008

What A Shock...

NOT.

Thousands who should be ineligible are registered to vote

More than 30,000 Florida felons who by law should have been stripped of their right to vote remain registered to cast ballots in this presidential battleground state, a Sun Sentinel investigation has found.

Many are faithful voters, with at least 4,900 turning out in past elections.Another 5,600 are not likely to vote Nov. 4 — they're still in prison.


The most shocking part?

Of the felons who registered with a party, Democrats outnumber Republicans more than two to one.


I'm certain this is just coincidence, right?

Now, someone refresh my memory. Which state was it that Bush was accused of "stealing" from Al Gore in 2000?

Which state is currently in play between Obama and McCain?

Nope, nothing to see here, folks. Ignore the cheating behind the curtain...

That is all.

AAR: King Richard's Faire 2008

For fifteen years now, Mrs. G. and I (and the kidlings, though not since 1993) have made the trek to Carver, MA for the annual run of King Richard's Faire. It's a Renaissance-themed faire, with jesters, troubadours, knights, pirates, princesses, and pretty much everything that a young boy or girl could dream of to strike their fancy.

Obviously, I was hooked from Day One.

We've gone in costume every year as well, picking up pieces through the years (and, in my case, adding more weaponry - I'm sure that comes as a surprise to everyone...). Even the kids have their costumes, although certainly not as lavish - we'd go broke the way those two grow! Every year it's gotten better, as the kids have gotten bigger and more independent. We no longer have to drag a carriage, stroller, or wagon with us (although by the end of the day Daddy's little princess did need a shoulder ride...).

I do have to admit, though, that I got the most exposure in 2001 when we went with my 8 month old son and I stopped at one of the shows to give him his bottle - in full garb complete with chain mail. I literally had dozens of pictures taken of me, the black-clad barbarian stopping to feed his baby. I probably stood out as much as the guy yesterday in the stormtrooper costume (I'm not kidding...).

Anyhoo, I know what you're here for - cute kid pics... Without further ado, then...



That's The Boy at the knighting ceremony (and yes, BabyGirl G is there, too, she's just hidden behind King Richard's robes).



There's BabyGirl G in all her medieval splendor. I just loved how that profile picture came out!

And, lastly, your humble host:



(I'd already put away the full meter broadsword slung across my back, but you can see it in last year's picture)

Anyhoo... A good time was had by all; the kids actually stayed (relatively) human the whole time, and we managed to get out of there only marginally poorer than when we went in...

Life is good. Even in the middle ages...

That is all.

Range Report: Glock 30 .45 ACP

I need to start making this a more regular feature - a range report following the first outing with a new firearm...

I took my new-to-me Glock 30 to the range last Friday. I put it through some quick paces, rapid-fire drills and quick-mag changes; generally a reliability test that I insist any carry gun go through before I am comfortable carrying it.

Five second review: It's easily as reliable, accurate, and controllable as the SW99 I've been carrying. Only instead of 10+1 rounds of 9mm +P+ JHPs, I'll now have 10+1 rounds of .45 ACP +P JHPs...

Gee, ain't that a kick in the head?

Need proof?



I'm still pulling my shots a little on the low side under rapid fire; definitely something to work on down the road. The target on the left is the SW99 9mm - definitely more comfortable with this firearm; of course, I've put at least a couple thousand rounds through it, so I should be. The Glock 30 target's on the right - this is the very first target I shot with the new Glock. I'd say the results between the two pistols are pretty comparable, all things considered...

How did the Colt shoot? In a word, beautifully:





Not too shabby for a 60+ year old gun. Hard to argue with a grouping of less than 1". And that's free-hand, with fixed sights consisting of a groove carved into the top strap - not the deluxe adjustable target sights of the S&W Model 17...

All in all, a good day's work.

That is all.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

The Difference Between Love & Obsession...

Love is: Dragging yourself out of a NyQuil-induced coma to change the sheets on your daughter's bed after an accident.

Obsession is: Dragging yourself to the computer afterwards to blog about it.

That is all...

Uh Oh...

Just found out that Mrs. G. has been reading the ol' blog.

Good thing I don't say anything controversial...

Heh.

That is all.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Quiet...

I never realized just how quiet my house could be.

Without the kids running around, I can think. I can eat my lunch uninterrupted. I can watch the entire second season of "The Tick" without having to answer 70 QPM (Questions Per Minute) from The Boy.

It's kinda nice.

For the day. Only.

I don't know what the hell I'm gonna do when they grow up. Life will certainly not be the same....

That is all.

New Blogs! New Blogs! Part II

Got a few new blogs to add to the MArooned blogroll.


First up, please welcome Will from Will's Workbench to the list. He's another one I just happened to stumble across, noticing an incoming link in my daily (hourly) perusal of Sitemeter.


Next up is The Saj from N.U.G.U.N., a self-proclaimed "New User of Guns". (psst, The Saj? It's customary to actually, y'know, have someone on your blogroll before you ask them to reciprocate, 'k?) :)

And last, but certainly not least, is ChrisB over at Guns and Guts (love the title Chris!). Chris gets the anchor spot because he actually {gasp} sent me an e-mail telling me he added me to his blogroll! Thanks Chris!

Lots of new blogs to read, folks; all full of promise and gunnie goodness...

Go. Read. Enjoy.

That is all.

Day Off! Party Time! Excellent!

I got the memo from Accounting a short time ago that I needed to burn some vacation time before the end of the year, so I took today off to make an extra-long weekend (we're closed Monday for Columbus Day).

It's nice. I got to sleep in - since I could workout after the kids left for school, I got to sleep until 6:45 AM today. Woke up, got the kids off to school, worked out. Came home, loaded up for the range, and jumped in the shower.

It's nice to be able to do all that without interjections of "he's touching me!" or "she's in my room!".




Three guesses what I'll be doing shortly:



If you guessed "clinging bitterly to my guns", give yourself a gold star...

Be back soon. But not too soon. I have evil black silhouettes to ventilate and dastardly orange clays to destroy.

Be vewy vewy quiet... I'm huntin' pigeons...

That is all.

Friday Fun Thread: Guys and Dolls

Heh. Since I've been accused recently of being a neanderthal (grunt! grunt! oog SMASH!), I'm going to let my knuckles drag today...

Today's fun thread is going to center on the gender-specificity of certain makes of automobiles.

This ought to be good...




For instance, the Ford Mustang. Definitely a male car. Ditto the new Dodge Challenger, or the Chevrolet Corvette.

If you're a man driving a VW Beetle, though, check yourself into the man clinic, stat. Testosterone replacement therapy begins in 3... 2... 1...

For the ladies, the Saab 9-3 convertible is a sweet little runabout. Ditto the Mazda Miata.

With the popularity of the SUV in the 1990s, trucks were no longer the sole domain of the XY set. The Jeep Liberty is definitely a truck for the fairer sex. The Dodge Ram with Hemi, of course, is reserved only for those with the highest levels of testosterone permitted by law...

And the VW GTI, of course, is so totally a girl's car that no self-respecting male would even consider being a passenger in one... (I kid! I kid! I actually owned an '86 GTI back in the day).

Surprisingly enough, minivans are neither male- nor female- biased. They're just boxy and slow. Ditto station wagons, with the notable exception of the Dodge Magnum. Definitely a guy's car. Subaru wagons, though, are definitely for the ladies.

Not all sports cars are for the men, though; the BMW Z3 roadster is totally for the ladies (yes, that is completely and totally blatant sucking up to her Tamness...)

Some cars are so freakin' stupid they belong to neither the guys nor the gals. The Porsche Cayenne is one. Ditto the Lincoln Blackwood.

And some cars are so cool they transcend mere gender roles. Even in pink, the 1959 Cadillac El Dorado Biarritz convertible could be driven by a man with no compunction. And an XKE Jaguar is so timelessly beautiful that the gender of the driver is totally irrelevant.

Lastly, utilitarian vehicles, whether they be plain Jane SUVs, blasé Japanese sedans, or economical commuter cars, are androgynous.




Well, that's about all I can think of off the top of my head (which, as my pictures can attest, has no hair due to the raging excess testosterone coursing through my veins). Now that I've probably offended a good 98% of my readers, and pegged myself for a hopeless misogynist, have a good Friday!

That is all.

Friday Gun Pr0n #80

I just have to atone for the plastic-fantastic of last week. Plus, as you've no doubt picked up on by now, I like to match the Gun Pr0n number with something in the armory. When I realized that this week was #80, it started ringing a bell as to what today's picture would be...

Heh. How fitting. After the G30 Glock in .45 ACP, here's its foil:

Colt Gold Cup National Match 1911. Also .45 ACP. This is about as different from the Glock as I could possibly get.

Stainless steel finish. Single action only. Redundant safeties. Nearly 100 years of history. It's the perfect yang to the Glock's yin, the peanut butter to the Glock's chocolate, the Laverne to the Glock's Shirley.

It's also one of my very favorite handguns.

I'm taking the Glock to the range today (day off! Party time! Excellent!) and will be shooting it side-by-side with another polymer gun, my S&W SW99C 9mm. It will be interesting to see how the Glock shoots compared to the Colt - obviously I'm not expecting the same level of accuracy, given the significant design and platform differences - and a Range Report will most likely comprise next week's Gun Pr0n.

That is all.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Equipment Bleg: Deep Cover

Just curious if anyone out there uses a deep-cover concealment holster like Thunderwear or Smartcarry. I've been thinking of getting something for the J-frame for the times when I'm wearing jeans or shorts and don't have a good way to conceal without a cover garment (i.e. when pocket carry isn't an option). It also looks like it would be a good option for carrying while exercising - perhaps not jogging, but walking or biking.

Anyone out there use this type of holster? I'm just wondering how comfortable it would be given the placement; I'm also more than a little leery of intentionally placing firepower that close to my junk... ;) The price is moderate, compared to high-end leather, but not inconsequential if it's going to wind up in my "holster drawer" after two or three uses (like the shoulder rig I bought for my SW99, but that's another story...). I'm curious if it's worth picking one up to give it a shot (pun intended). I mean, I've seen them at gun shows and all, but let's face it, that's marketing in action...

Thanks in advance for any information.

That is all.

Inanimate Objects...

In comments to my "Heartbreaking" post about the gun turn-in held in MA recently, commenter mikeb302000 asks:
Jay, Isn't it possible that the program is designed to prevent any of these guns from getting into the wrong hands? "
...
"Those weapons were obviously not doing anyone any good, but they were waiting for the odd burglar to introduce them into the black market. That won't happen now.

Where to begin?

First off, this needs immediate addressing: "Those weapons were obviously not doing anyone any good" They also weren't doing anyone any bad, either. They are firearms. They are inanimate objects utterly incapable of performing acts of good or evil. They are nothing more than chunks of metal and wood engineered for a specific purpose. Whether that purpose is good, evil, or morally neutral is 100% dependent on the human employing said tool.

There's a word for this line of thought: Deodand. It was a portion of old English law that stipulated that an instrument used in the death of a person was forfeit and should be destroyed; that there was inherit evil in the tool used.

Have we not progressed beyond the Middle Ages?

Secondly, why not sell the guns to licensed gun owners? It could raise money for the community, or give the proceeds to a local charity, or bring in a helluva lot more money than selling the guns for scrap, that's for damn sure. There's a lot of history in those inanimate chunks of metal and wood - what a shameful, disgraceful waste to destroy them simply to "keep them out of the hands of bad guys".

I'm pretty darn certain that they won't fall into the wrong hands sitting in my gun safe.

Lastly, using that same logic gets us to complete gun bans - we can't allow people to own guns because someone might break in and steal them. When we start destroying inanimate objects based on nothing more than the possibility that someone might misuse them, well, brother, I don't want to be a part of that world.

Let me pose another scenario: Granny fails her eye test. Her license is voided. She's got a perfectly good 2004 Buick LeSabre sitting in her driveway.

Do we destroy that Buick because someone might drive it while intoxicated and hit someone?

Propose that, and see how quickly you get laughed off the stage.

Nope. Sorry. Ain't gonna fly. It's only certain politically incorrect inanimate objects that face the cutter's torch. And I call bullshit on that practice.

That is all.

Shaking My Head Here, Boss...

Woman says she was shot in the leg by her stove
SEKIU, Wash. - A woman said she was shot in the leg by her stove. Cory Davis told the Peninsula Daily News she had just stoked her cast-iron heating stove Sunday when she heard a loud bang and was struck in her left calf.

Davis said a case of shotgun shells spilled about a month ago at her home and one must have landed in the newspapers she used to light the stove.

Uhhhhh. No.

Your stove didn't shoot you in the leg, lady. Being a lazy idiot who has no business owning a waffle iron, let alone a firearm, put you in a position where your own carelessness caused harm to yourself. (Assuming, of course, that the account is correct; this could easily be a drunken ND that she's trying to cover up...)

How the bloody hell do you not realize that you are loading a shotgun shell into your stove? I mean, even a .410 shell is pretty darn big; one would think that the fact that the paper weighed about treble what it should might have sounded some warning bells... But then again, I don't make a habit of storing my ammunition directly over my combustibles, so what the hell do I know?

Friggin' people. Sometimes I fear for the human race. The rest of the time, I buy more ammo...

Side note: Please note the new Post Label of "Striking Stupidity". I cannot believe it's taken me this long to create this category...

That is all.

Startin' Young...

So my son walks into our bathroom this morning, still groggy from waking up.

He staggers over to me, looks up at me, and queries, "Hey, dad, it's Thursday, right?"

I reply, "Sure is, pal. Why d'you ask?"

He looks me in the eye and answers, "Because that means tomorrow's Friday!"...

Seven years old and he's got the weekend itch. This does not bode well...

That is all.

Last Ride...

The last ride of the season is coming up.

Whenever the leaves start turning, I know it's that time. It's time to start thinking about putting the bike away for the winter. I'm not fortunate enough to live in a climate that permits year-round riding; nor am I hardy enough to venture out once the mercury has dipped below freezing. So every November the bike goes into storage for the winter, tucked away all snug in a warehouse somewhere in New Jersey (I think).

Yeah, I bring it to the Harley dealership for winter storage. Our garage just isn't big enough for a full sized pick-up truck, mid-sized car, and touring motorcycle, and once the snow starts falling I want to park inside. Plus, I know me and how I've handled winterizing in the past - basically, I stuff the bike in a corner, promising myself I'll start it up every two weeks and take it out for a run once a month.

Then it sits for four months straight completely untouched, resulting in a dead battery, a day or two of push-starting, and a good week or two of listening to the carbs squeal in anguish as gobs of carbonized crap get stuffed through them... When it was a $700 Honda, it wasn't a big deal. With the Harley, though, it's much more important to stay on top of things. So I pony up the cash and have it stored at the dealership. They change the oil, wash it, and keep the battery charged in a heated warehouse. It's a good deal, all things considered, and I chalk it up as one of the costs of ownership and me being lazy.

More precisely, though, it means that storage is pretty darn final. I can't just bleed the stabilizer out of the fuel line, hook the battery back up, and go for a quick ride if we have an abnormally warm day. Which means that once the leaves start turning, I know my time in the saddle is drawing to a close yet again, to be put on winter hiatus until the spring.

One of the mitigating factors, though, is that I have the good fortune to close my riding season in fall in New England. My last few rides are taken down winding country roads with nature's own fireworks exploding with color; a kaleidoscopic treat best viewed atop a leather seat with one's knees in the breeze. Fall means brisk rides requiring layers of clothes, chaps, and the heavy winter gauntlets - meaning that I'm more relaxed with all my protective gear on.

I try to get out every weekend in October if at all possible, and this year I have the distinct pleasure of being able to take The Boy with me. This will be his first year experiencing the fall foliage a la Harley; I certainly expect it won't be his last. He's not quite ready for the Blast Up The Kanc, where we take off up 93, head across the venerable Kancamagus (not Kancamangus or Kankamagus!) Highway, then home via Route 16 - it's an all-day event, and he's just not quite ready for that much saddle time.

But he might be ready for the NH seacoast tour - Route 1A along the Atlantic Ocean from Seabrook to Portsmouth is one of my most favorite rides going. You travel along the Atlantic Ocean for about 20 miles with views like this the whole time. It's about an hour's worth of riding, and it gets cold along the coast, so we might just have to stop into Dunkin' Donuts to get some hot chocolate. I know, I know, it's a tough life, but someone's gotta lead it.

I am almost looking forward to this year's Last Ride. This year I can share it with one of my favorite people, further cementing his love of two wheels and (hopefully) sharing some quality father-son time. Maybe, if we're really lucky, we can embark on an Indian summer day, with warm breezes greeting us instead of cold wintry air. Or we'll just bundle up in layers of leather and let the heat of the V-twin be our warmth.

That is all.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Heartbreaking...

Residents call on police to remove unwanted guns

FITCHBURG— Police collected 25 weapons over the weekend when they launched a firearm disposal program. Police Capt. Mark W. Louney said residents from several places in the city called to get unwanted firearms out of their houses. “They just didn’t want them around anymore,” he said. “I was kind of surprised we recovered so many.”

...

No money was given in exchange for the weapons, most of which seemed to have been tucked aside for years, Capt. Louney said. Several of the callers were widowed spouses of gun owners or their children.


Look at the picture in the article. There's at least one S&W snubbie, a 1911, and what appears to be an old Colt semi-auto (1908?) as well as several side-by-side shotguns and even a Remington Nylon 66.

All of which will be destroyed, literally, for nothing. That widow who handed in her husband's WWII 1911 just gave away hundreds of dollars, if not more. That Nylon 66 is worth $500 or so.

All this going into a smelter so the police can be seen as "doing something" about crime. Sickening. Positively sickening.

I hate this state.

(Hat tip to poster Glockguy17 at the Northeastshooters forum for posting this story here).

That is all.

The Right Apple...

Part of my morning routine is my mid-morning snack. Most days, it's an apple, typically of the red delicious variety, although this time of year it's equally likely to be a Macintosh - it depends on whether or not we make it out apple-picking at the local orchard or not. (Side note: BabyGirl G likes to point out that she doesn't go apple-picking, she goes apple-eating...)

I like apples. They're good for you, low-calorie, and tasty. Sometimes you get one that's a little mushy; sometimes it's a bit underripe and tart; sometimes bland. But every once in a while, the apple is perfect. It's sweet, succulent, and every bite is a sapid delight. Those are the apples to cherish. They're few and far between, but when you find one, there's nothing to do but enjoy every last morsel.

The trick, though, is to not get caught up in the search for that apple. Don't make the experience hinge on finding just the right apple; rather, let it happen on its own. Quite often we get so caught up in having to have the perfect apple that we ignore other, equally perfect ones along the way; even worse, the entire experience is soured by the inability to achieve that perfection every time.

Rather, let it happen. Do not search, but merely enjoy the perfection when you find it.

That is (existentially) all.

Didn't See THAT Coming!

Celebs Who Lean To The Right

Dennis Hopper?

Billy votes Republican? I think that's one of the signs of the Apocalypse...

That is all.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Your Mission, Should You Choose To Accept It...

...is to find Epijunky a handgun.

Her criteria are pretty open, but tough:

Protection for myself and the kiddos. That's all I want. And despite what my former partner says, I'm not a horrible shot. Really I'm not. And I'm already enrolled in a class. (Thanks former partner :))

I'm asking from the position of someone with not a whole lot of cash to spend. That being said, I have some friends who are willing to donate to the cause... So think $300.00 or so. For a handgun.

What do I need to protect myself??? In addition to a CCL.



Hmmm. The $300 is somewhat limiting. For new handguns, it's pretty much either junk guns (Raven, Cobra, etc.), small stuff like North American Arms, or lower-end. A couple of options that don't suck are the Smith & Wesson Sigma series or Charter Arms revolvers.

The S&W SW40VE is a decent option - on sale, at the local gun shop, it's running $290 - $310 for a new gun. And S&W customer service is excellent. This model line has had its share of complaints, though, most centering on the rough trigger. With time and some work, though, it's a decent starter gun. It's a little big for concealed carry, but for 15 rounds of .40 S&W goodness for around $300, it's not a bad option.


The Charter Arms Mag Pug looks like a decent option for a new revolver. Five shots of .357 Magnum goodness will settle any goblin's hash, and you can practice with more benign (and less expensive) .38 Special. An MSR of $375 means this should retail under $300 as well. I'm not terribly familiar with Charter Arms, as they're not on the Approved Firearms Roster here in the Volksrepublik. I know they've gone into bankruptcy a couple of times, first as Charter Arms, then Charter 2000, and I think there might have even been another iteration in there somewhere. But the guns are solid, if a little less polished than a Colt or Smith.


Another option would be a Kel-Tec PF9 or P11. Both pistols are chambered in 9mm, which is on the lower end of self-defense caliber but still passable. The PF9 is a single-stack model (7+1 capacity), the P11 is a double-stack (10+1, and it will accept S&W 59-series high capacity magazines). Both are available for around $300 new. I've got a P3AT, the .380 ACP version (my gun to have when I can't have a gun), and I love it for concealability - it weighs like half a pound and is just teeny. It has always gone bang when I pull the trigger, altough the sights are rudimentary and take some getting used to to get on target.






For everything else, it's really going to be something used. Either the Smith & Wesson M&P series or Glock's mid-sized line (19 or 23) should be plentiful in the mid-$300s for decent, affordable, reliable self-protection. Either choice there would be backed by the manufacturer should anything go wrong, although in both cases there's not a lot expected to go wrong. As I mentioned in last Friday's gun pr0n, people say a lot of things about Glocks, but being unreliable generally isn't one of them...

There's quite a few bargains to be had with Smith & Wesson autoloaders out there, particularly their "budget" line like the 410 or the 908. The Ruger P345, which Bruce swears by, is a little on the heavier side for concealed carry but does offer 8+1 rounds of .45 ACP goodness. For a bit of German engineering, you can't do much better than a SigSauer P6/225 ($280!), although once again a bit on the heavy and large side for a concealed piece.

In the revolver world, there's still lots of old S&W model 10s out there with the 2" barrel that are perfectly adequate for self-defense, and with everyone looking for semi-autos, prices are very reasonable - guns in good condition can be found for around $200 - $250. Used 637s and 642s (snub-nosed revolvers either with hammer or hammerless) are an excellent choice for concealed carry - I carry a snubnose revolver probably 8 months out of the year - but do take a little getting used to, with less weight to absorb recoil.

Another option would be any of the fine revolvers available from Mssrs. Sturm & Ruger. The SP 101, while a tad heavier than I'd like for concealed carry, offers five rounds of .357 Magnum firepower in a concealable package. The GP 100 is larger (harder to conceal) but more "shootable" and has the extra round capacity as well. Both should be available used for around $300. Colts, for the most part, are out unless you're looking at well-used Official Police Specials from the 1950s.

That's the basics of what's available in this price range in "serious" calibers. There's a lot of .380s out there that are quite concealable and fall into this price range, but that's starting to fall outside the scope of the original question. There's also options like the AMT Back-up .45 ACP, which is both small (concealable) and inexpensive, but it's not an option I can recommend. The company is out of business, so if something happens to the gun you have a very expensive paperweight; and generally the AMTs were hit-or-miss with quality control to start with.

So...

What did I miss? I know for certain my experience is significantly limited, living in the Volksrepublik of MA. I'm sure I've missed a whole slew of excellent handgun bargains that are available to people living in America. Jump in with your choices or feel free to critique mine.




As for my opinion of what I'd get in this price range, I'll hedge my bets. If I were getting something primarily for concealed carry, it would be a used Smith & Wesson model 642. I've been very well-served by my model 38 (old-school shrouded hammer) for summer duty, and with two Bianchi speed strips, 17 rounds of .38 Special +P goodness ought to do the trick quite nicely.

If it's something for home protection, but with the option of home defense, I'd look for either the Ruger P345 or a Glock 23. The Glock has the advantage of 15 round magazine capacity (using G22 magazines), the Ruger having the advantage of being in .45 ACP...

That is all.

Presidential Debate #2... Live And Direct!

Okay... Here we are. Debate #2.

John McCain. Barack Obama. Town hall format.

Gotta get sci-fi on the phone.

Debate on Fox News.

Let's get it on!



9:01: CNN's already called the debate for Obama...



Topics we will not be covering tonight:

Gun control.

Fannie Mae execs on Obama's election committee

Domestic terrorists

Topics we will be covering:

Why the economic downturn is solely John McCain's fault.

Why Barack Obama is so awesome.



Okay. Enough silliness, debate's starting...



I'm Tom Brokaw of the Obama campai-err, NBC news...



Obama's first. Didn't see that coming...



9:08 PM: Candidates are on the stage...



OMG. The first questioner is the principal from Back to the Future!



Why, yes, let's let Fannie Mae contribute to your campaign some more, Barry.



So... The execs that got golden parachutes... should be... fired?



Wow. John McCain is in super slo-mo...



Energy independence. I don't believe that was the question, John...

AAAUUUGGGHHH!!!!



Holy crap. I'm waiting for McCain to say "Who are all you people, and why are you in my living room?"

...

Someone, please, get the hook and get him off the stage. This is painful...



9:15 PM Obama is coming off far more polished.



Middle class tax cut. Just like the one Clinton gave us...



Apparently this is all economy all the time.

...

Here we go with the Main Street. (And the number one reference that I am ramming into the ground...)



WHAT? McCain mentioned Fannie Mae? Whoa!

Good on you, John, for pointing out the campaign contributions.

YES! Second-highest campaign contribution to Obama. Point, McCain.

...

Obama's got a canned answer. Sci-fi thinks it will involve "Keating 5"...



Okay. Every company in the US is going to close if we don't elect Obama. Gotcha.



Not me. No, your campaign just hired all the former Fannie Mae executives.



Obama seemed stunned at that question.

"UH". Seems to be the quote of the night.

..

Um, Barry? Other countries are doing bad, too. Check the Nikkei...



Holy crap, where did they dig up this harpie?

...

There's a lot of blame to go around. But all of it to George Bush and John McCain.

...

We had a deficit before Bush came to office, Barry.



And let's not forget who has controlled Congress for the past two years...



Mention Vietnam about 500 times. It worked for John Kerry...

...

AAAAUUUUUGGGGHHHH!!!! Campaign Finance Reform. Thanks a lot, JOHN. We've been trying to FORGET that.



sci-fi is threatening to switch to chocolate scotch if McCain keeps huffing and puffing...

...

We've got another hour of this. I'm gonna need a bigger bottle of bourbon...



Point out how many times Obama has voted against the Democratic party line, John.



9:30 PM : Huh??? Did McCain just say that $700 Billion is going to terrorists? I hope he means Bill Ayers...



Uh, Barry? The government is not my family. My family makes their own money. The government takes money from people...



Riiiiight. A Democrat's going to eliminate programs. Let's see if he can do it outside of the Pentagon...

...

First question from the internet is a child of the Depression. Interesting. (good catch B)



WOW. That was a GREAT question. What will they ask of us? We know that the Obama campaign considers it patriotic to pay more taxes...

...

John, drop the earmarks. SRSLY.



Earmarks, earmarks, earmarks...

...

Rifleshots. Something tells me that's the closest we're going to get to guns tonight...



"A lot of people here remember 9/11"????????????????????????

WHAT. THE. FUCK. OVER.



Yes! Tell the people to put a sweater on, Barry! It worked for Jimmeh!

...

Bearing the burden of renewing America. Can someone translate that into English?



CEOs get more from tax cuts BECAUSE THEY PAY MORE.

What's the number of CEOs making over a million dollars a year? Anyone know? Because Obama's sure hoping we don't know...



McCain just said a bunch of stuff, but I'll be damned if I caught any of it...



A ticking time bomb that will eat us up?

Apparently this time bomb is composed of Pac-Man...



"The straight talk express lost a wheel" I quote Syndrome. Lame, lame, LAME!



9:45 PM Wait a minute. How much money would CEOs get back? I missed it the first 58 times Barack mentioned it...

WOW. Did McCain just sass Tom Brokaw?



OUCH! Pointing out Obama's Senate campaign promises, one of which was... {drum roll, please} Middle class tax cuts!

...

Oh GAWD, not "climate change"...



OOOOH! I was a Navy ship running on nuclear power. Ignore the four bouts of cancer treatment I've undergone...



Did Barry just use "Cris-a-tunity"?

...

Global Warming is a national security issue?



A nuclear bomb to fight global warming. I could get behind that...

...

Is it just me, or has this debate taken a turn for the surreal?



The reason that health costs so much is the illegal immigrants who don't pay a dime - b, sci-fi's wife.

...

Obama is bragging about his health insurance? Wha? This is like Biden bragging about his house during the VP debate.



[McCain] Speaking as a senior citizen, I know about health care...

...

I missed something. Did McCain say Obama would find us?



10:00 PM: Only half an hour less. 30 minutes. 1800 seconds...



HEALTH CARE IS NOT A FUCKING RIGHT.

...

What? It's currently legal for insurance companies to cheat their customers? Did Obama just say that?



McCain voting for deregulation is a PLUS, Barry...

...

Foreign policy coming up. Ought to be interesting.

...

McCain looks like a zombie coming after the villagers in Dawn of the Dead. (sci-fi)



No one suggested Iraq would be "quick and easy". Fucking liar.



Wait a minute. Were our troops behaving heroically when they were airraiding villages and killing civilians, Barry?

...

EXCUSE THE FUCK OUT OF ME. The slaughter in Africa has been going on for more than eight years.

Remember Maddie Albright and "genocide-like"?



WE COULD HAVE STOPPED RWANDA. AAAAAUUUUGGGHHHH!!!!

Is Obama saying we didn't have the military ability in the 1990s to stop what was going on in Rwanda?

Is that really his position?



The slaughter in Rwanda was carried out with machetes. What the fuck is a "No-Fly Zone" going to do?

...

This guy has no fucking clue. None whatsoever.



That's pretty gutsy, mentioning the Marines in Lebanon.



Reverse course. Typical liberal weasel-speak for RUN AWAY...

...

Pakistan? Isn't that the nuclear power Barry thinks we should invade?



We ARE crushing Al Quaeda.



10:15 PM: Brokaw's "hired help", huh? Wonder how much Obama's paying him?



Obama-bot is running out of batteries.

...

Annihilation of North Korea? Sounds good to me!



Side benefit of the laptop: It runs so hot, my snack ships are already toasted!



YES! SLAM him on that one, John.



"If either of you becomes President"???

Uh... Tom?



Hmmm. Was this debate supposed to be entirely about the economy and the war in Iraq, or is it just coincidence that the two biggest negatives of the Bush administration have dominated the debate?



Penalties. If it's an Obama administration, I'd guess they'll threaten the Russians with... a strongly worded resolution! And if that fails to motivate them, they'll move on to... another strongly worded resolution!

...

Refresh my memory. I could have sworn we went into Afghanistan before Iraq...

...

Energy is key is dealing with Russia? How much oil do we get from Russia? (Answer: They're not in the top ten)



I thought McCain was going over to give him the Vulcan death grip for a second there... Either that or shoot lighting bolts at him like Emperor Palpatine...



"I will do everything that's required"? That's an odd phrase to use when talking about terrorists getting nuclear weapons.

...

Ah, yes. Issue sanctions. That worked so well to contain Saddam Hussein in the 1990s, didn't it?



Last question. Thank goodness.

"What don't you know, and how will you learn it?"

Interesting question. And stupid...

...

Did Obama just say that it's Bush's fault some kids don't go to college?


McCain gets last ups. Here's hoping he stays awake...

...

uhhhh... A good chunk of Americans can't find Texas on a map, John...


And he tries to one-up Obama's childhood story... Bad move.


This concludes the debate. THANK GOD.

Wow. I need a Valium...

That is all.

File Under "M"...

...for More shit I don't need...

I just got a phone call from Mrs. G.

Apparently, while the kids were playing outside for afternoon recess, BabyGirl G. got stung by a bee. On her finger.

It appears she's not allergic, which is a relief. There's a family history on my side of the family of rather serious allergies to bee stings, and while The Boy has been tested and found allergy-free, my princess has not.

*Sigh*. The scary thing is, I signed up for this...

That is all.

Once More Into The Breech...

Just in case anyone's interested, I'm planning on live-blogging the second McCain/Obama debate tonight at 9:00 PM EST.

After watching the Palin/Biden debate last week, and then incredulously watching the media declare Biden the winner by more than 2 to 1, it's a moral imperative that the McCain/Obama debate be documented for posterity.

Given that this is a "town hall" style format, favored by McCain, and will play to Obama's weakness of not being able to rely on a teleprompter, I'm expecting McCain to do well. Of course, with the media as far in Obama's camp as they've been, I'm assuming this means they'll only declare Obama the winner by a margin of 10%...

See you tonight!

That is all.

OMG! Imagine the Possibilities!

Okay... I'm not a TV person, but even I think this is pretty freakin' cool:

Scientist: Holographic television to become reality
LONDON, England (CNN) -- Picture this: you're sat down for the Football World Cup final, or a long-awaited sequel to the "Sex and the City" movie and you're watching all the action unfold in 3-D on your coffee table.

It sounds a lot like a wacky dream, but don't be surprised if within our lifetime you find yourself discarding your plasma and LCD sets in exchange for a holographic 3-D television that can put Cristiano Ronaldo in your living room or bring you face-to-face with life-sized versions of your gaming heroes.

Life-size 3-D images. Imagine the possibilities... Okay, enough of that, this is a family blog... (okay, not really, but work with me).

I had to laugh at this part, though:
Peyghambarian said there are no major sponsors of the technology at present, but as the breakthroughs continued, he hopes that will change.

Even if no major electronics company commit themselves, there is hope that backers could come from outside of the consumer electronics industry, he said.

Pffft. Trek geeks alone would be more than happy to pony up any capital you needed to get this underway. Hell, if it weren't for horny geeks with disposable income we wouldn't have seen the advances in video and computer graphics...

That is all.

All That Was Old...

...Is new again.

Ford feature will let parents set limits for teens

DETROIT (AP) — So you think junior is a little too lead-footed when he drives the family car? Starting next year, Ford Motor Co. will give you the power to do something about it.

The company will roll out a new feature on many 2010 models that can limit teen drivers to 80 mph, using a computer chip in the key.


Hate to tell you this, guys, but this technology existed when I was a teenager. Only instead of calling it "MyKey", it was called "underpowered pieces of GM shit"...

Why do you need a chip to limit speed to 80 MPH when piss-poor engineering and shoddy workmanship result in the dashboard vibrating violently at any speed about 65 MPH?

I especially liked this:

In addition to speed limits, MyKey also will limit the volume of the audio system

We had that, too. We called it "AC Delco"...

This trip down Amnesia Lane brought to you by a bitter old fart who remembers the bad old days when American cars were slow and had crappy sound systems. And we liked it, dagnabit!

That is all.

Coincidence?

I'm certain that the following two headlines have nothing in common:

Clinton goes to bat for Obama and party
WASHINGTON — Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton has raised more than $8 million for former rival Barack Obama's presidential campaign since July and plans to barnstorm the country for even more cash, as the New York senator works to show she is aggressively helping the candidate who cut short her White House bid.


and

RNC to File FEC Complaint on Obama Fundraising Practices

A lawyer for the Republican National Committee today said the party will ask the Federal Election Commission to look into the source of thousands of small-dollar contributions to the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama.

The RNC is alleging that the Obama campaign was so hungry for donations it "looked the other way" as contributions piled up from suspicious, and possibly even illegal foreign donors.


I mean, it's not like a Clinton would ever take foreign cash, right?

Right?

That is all.

Monday, October 6, 2008

Boys Being Boys

Boy Scouts, that is.

North Andover Scouts return long-lost pocketbook with $600 cash
NORTH ANDOVER — Nick Cote and Kyle Skelton felt like rich kids the day they found a soggy, smelly, brown leather pocketbook containing $600 in cash while cleaning up trash on the Saco River in Maine.
...

But the dreams of going out on a shopping spree didn't last long when the boys discovered credit cards and other identification inside the purse.

"We decided it would be the right thing to give it back to the owners," Kyle said.

"If I lost $600, I'd want it returned. So we wanted to return it to the people who lost it," Nick agreed.

Way to go Nick and Kyle!!!

The story gets even better:
"Unbelievable — the honesty that it took to do this. We told them to keep half the cash," Mike Dionne said.

I did have to disagree with one statement:
"They don't make kids like that anymore. I've never seen anyone that honest in all of my life. The parents of those kids should be proud," she said.

I've got a whole pack of boys like that. I can't imagine any of my Scouts not returning the money.

Not only did they return the purse and get a reward, the story continues to get better:
As for the reward money, the Scouts decided it wouldn't be right to spend it on themselves because they found the money during a troop project.

Instead, the boys decided the money will be used to buy the lumber and concrete footings for the boardwalk extension on the nature trail that leads to the Sargent School Woodland Study Area.

Those two boys have more character than 95% of our Congress, folks. Now, granted, that's damning with faint praise I'll admit...

Good job, guys. Good job.

That is all.

Riddle Me This Part II...

Much hay has been made about Sarah Palin's international experience. The gist of the matter, it seems, is that she doesn't have an awful lot.

Okay, I can see why that might be a matter of some concern.

What I can't see, though, is where Barack Obama has any more experience in international events. Are we supposed to believe that the meager time he's spent on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee constitutes sufficient foreign policy experience?

In the time that Obama has been on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he has sponsored five resolutions:




S.CON.RES.25: "A concurrent resolution condemning the recent violent actions of the Government of Zimbabwe against peaceful opposition party activists and members of civil society."
Latest Major Action: 6/26/2007 Held at the desk.

S.J.RES.23: "A joint resolution clarifying that the use of force against Iran is not authorized by the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq, any resolution previously adopted, or any other provision of law. "
Latest Major Action: 11/1/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

S.433: "A bill to state United States policy for Iraq, and for other purposes.
Latest Major Action: 1/30/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

S.1977: "A bill to provide for sustained United States leadership in a cooperative global effort to prevent nuclear terrorism, reduce global nuclear arsenals, stop the spread of nuclear weapons and related material and technology, and support the responsible and peaceful use of nuclear technology."
Latest Major Action: 8/2/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

S.2433: "A bill to require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day."
Latest Major Action: 4/24/2008 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718.




Hmmm. Two resolutions dealing with US position on Iraq and Iran. Status: Run Away. One resolution saying nuclear weapons are bad, m'kay. One resolution saying global poverty is bad, m'kay. And one resolution saying massacre in Zimbabwe bad, m'kay.

Not exactly earth-shattering resolutions there, Barry.

And on the basis of this committee membership (and, by extension, these five resolutions), Barack Obama is completely immune to any criticism of his painfully thin global resume.

As my son would say, "Fascinating."

Now, if only we could get the media interested in "the least qualified person to ever run for President"...

That is all.

Well, DUH!

Taliban said to be furious over US strike

DERA ISMAIL KHAN, Pakistan: The Taliban are furious about the latest apparent U.S. missile strike in Pakistan, indicating a senior militant may be among two dozen people killed, officials and residents said Sunday.

The attack Friday on the North Waziristan tribal region was believed to have killed several Arab fighters but government officials have been notably quiet.
What the hell did they expect? The Taliban was going to be happy about missile strikes???



Heh.

That is all.

From the Mouths of Babes...

"Daddy?"

"Yes, sweetie?"

"When was the last time you smiled?"

[heart breaks]

"It's been a while, sweetie, since Daddy felt like smiling."

I. Must. Try. Harder.

That is all.

Topsfield Fair...

Took the family to Topsfield Fair yesterday. It's an annual tradition replete with sitting in traffic, paying an exhorbitant amount of money to park in a field, and having large quantities of cotton candy and powdered sugar stuck to our shoes.

But we have fun.

My parents never took me to the Fair. If I were a betting man, I'd say growing up on a working farm probably took all the charm and attraction out of paying good money to go gawk at livestock. When you spent a good chunk of your formative years feeding, milking, and herding cows, paying $8 so your kid can stare in slack-jawed splendor probably makes about as much sense as voting for Obama.

I kid, I kid...

I think, in some small way, going to the Fair is my way of atoning for living an admittedly surbubanite existence. My family, my ancestors, were farmers going back through the ages; my grandparents bought a large chunk of acreage "out in the sticks" when they arrived in America as a way of continuing their farming tradition. The Great Depression, WWII, and the Baby Boom of the 1950s and 60s turned the bucolic farming community into a bustling suburb; the sylvan lifestyle usurped by cookie-cutter houses and interstate 495. The farms of my childhood, gave way to shopping malls, with apologies to Chrissie Hynde.

So I bring the kids to the Fair every year. For one day out of the year, they can bounce around on real honest-to-goodness tractors; they can watch draft horses pulling wagons; they can walk through the petting farm and pet the goats and sheep. They can eat fried dough and cheese-fries by the bucketload; they can watch jugglers and magicians and troubadours to their hearts' content. We ooh and ahh over the cute bunnies; marvel at the sheer tonnage of the pigs; wander through the colors and scents of the floral exhibits; and take in the sights, sounds, and smells of the County Fair.

For my $22, it's a trip back in time. It harkens to an earlier time, when the Fair would often be the event of the year; people gathering to judge produce and award ribbons for largest, best-in-class, etc. Kids get to watch bees buzz around in the plexiglass hives; they get to watch a cow getting milked; they see police dogs put through their paces. It's all here. For one day out of the year, we can live a scene or two from Charlotte's Web, where we all go to the Fair.

And FWIW, the kids both went right to bed without fuss last night. That alone is worth the price of the ticket...

That is all.

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Testing...

Drive-by posting from the BU Law Library after supervising another administration of the LSAT (Law School Admission Test).

Six hours spent in the very belly of the beast - a law school in the heart of liberal-land...

Needless to say, I need to hit the range then get a beer...

That is all.

Friday, October 3, 2008

QOTD

Today's quote comes from the World's Most Dangerous Librarian:

Welcome to a brand new world. The one where the smallest person in the room just might be the most dangerous.


And therein lies a beautiful side benefit of the Second Amendment, folks: The equalizing factor. Someone of Breda's size doesn't have much of a chance against a guy my size unarmed. Even with an edged weapon, only the most skilled practioner of bladed combat could hope to prevail against an attacker nearly twice their size.

But 5 rounds of .38 special JHPs will take down even the most determined attacker, regardless of size.

I guess I'm biased a bit here; growing up I knew two young women brutally murdered by boyfriends. One was a friend of my sister, whose boyfriend couldn't accept that they were breaking up; the other was my friend's cousin, stabbed to death by her too-macho-to-take-goodbye 'roid head boyfriend. Either of which would have ended quite differently had the young women had Breda's mindset and firepower.

Needless to say, my little girl will be brought up to favor the mindset shown by our armed librarian.

That is all.

Friday Fun Thread: The Ugly '80s...

Okay. We've done the good cars of the '80s. We've done the bad cars of the '80s.

Naturally, today's thread is about the ugly American cars of the 1980s. This is going to be a tough one, because narrowing the list to 10 cars only is going to be challenging. A couple caveats to start with: First off, we're going to focus on American cars. Otherwise, the list would be filled right off the bat with Renault offerings... Secondly, it will be cars that were, for the most part, introduced in the 1980s - i.e., the AMC Pacer was on the market from 1975 to 1980, it doesn't count (even thought it is uuuuugly!).

So, without further ado, my choices for the ugliest cars of the 1980s!

1. 1987 AMC Eagle. This car has, quite possibly, every single possible design flaw. Fake woodgrain paneling? Check. Wire basket hubcaps? Check. Square, utterly lifeless grill? Check. Fender flares for skinny tires? Check. Chintzy door handles? Plastichrome? Check and check. UUUUUUuugly! This car was so bad I had to redefine the list...

2. Chevrolet Citation. I don't know what genius thought that 900 square feet of rear glass was a great idea, but they were wrong. It looked like they tried to make the Pacer uglier. And succeeded.

3. 1980 - 1985 Cadillac Seville. What the hell was up with that mutant trunk? Apparently GM felt so bad about giving the Citation such an odd rear end that they needed to short-sheet the Seville.

4. 1985 Ford Aerostar. How do you make the minivan even uglier? Well, I don't know, but Ford managed it with the Aerostar minivan. It looked like a regular minivan whose front got stepped on. If the intent was to create a vehicle with the worst possible airflow going, they succeeded.

5. 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. Ugh. So many little design flaws add up to one butt-ugly car. That cheese-grater front grill. The prismatic Chrysler emblem. The useless C-pillar windows. The crappy two-tone paint. Cheap-ass hubcaps. Ugh.

6. 1980 Ford Thunderbird. I shudder just looking at this car. From the elegance and simplicity of the '55 to '57 roadster to this... abomination... Ford should have killed the T-bird when it started to bloat in the 1970s... Look at that. Acres of cheap-ass imitation chrome. Vinyl roof. Crappy sunroof. What a shitbox.

7. Any K-car. What a lousy design. Hey, let's make a car that's ALL corners! No styling whatsoever! Not only that, but we'll make all the trip super extra low-grade, so it all falls off in the first month or so...

8. 1982 Ford Exp. I know! Let's take the already-hideous Escort and completely and utterly fail at making look sportier! You know what would really look great? Make the headlights stand out - it works for the Porsche 911!

9. 1988 Buick Regal. Ugh. After the rousing success of the Gran National, they did THIS to the Regal. Unforgivable... Melted corners, that weird wrap-up grill, laid-down emblem... Nothing like the earlier 1980s Regals. They could have had the decency to kill this model like they did the Monte Carlo, but nooooooooo.

10. 1980 Chrysler New Yorker. This looks like something out of a Paul Verhoeven movie. It is a concatenation of ugly. I particularly like the round headlights set inside the retractable, square, headlight bezel. Class.




Well, there's my list of ugly cars of the 1980s. I'm certain I missed a few, as it was a decade of ugly for certain. A good deal of cars I intended to put on this list, come to find out, started in the earlier parts of the 1970s. I think next week's list will try to choose the 10 ugliest cars from the 1970s. That's where the Chevette, Vega, Pinto, Pacer, Gremlin, et al will get their due...

That is all.

I Call Shenanigans!

Alternate title: On What Fucking Planet???

CBS Poll: Uncommitted Voters Say Biden Won
(CBS) Uncommitted voters who watched the vice presidential debate thought Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden did the best job by a margin of more than two to one, according to a CBS News/Knowledge Networks poll taken immediately following the debate.

However, there was good news in the poll for Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, too. Palin's debate performance improved uncommitted voters' perceptions of her overall, and on a number of specific measures. But uncommitted voters still have doubts about her ability to assume the presidency if necessary and she lags behind Biden on her knowledge and preparedness for the job.

46% to 21%??? Give me a fucking break. All Biden did was mumble into his chest, drone on incessantly, and lie through his creepy used car salesman teeth.

Like I said in comments over at Breda's: "Just because, with the current slant of the media, Biden could walk out on stage, clamp his hands firmly over his ears, and yell "LALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" for an hour and still be declared the "winner" of the debate..."

Obviously I am clairvoyant. Let me see what I can come up with for tonight's lottery numbers... Oh, wait. I predicted that the media would be biased in favor of the Obama camp. That's like predicting that a dog will lick its own balls...

Ugh. I picked the wrong day to stop sniffin' glue.

That is all.

Friday Gun Pr0n #79

Alternate title: I Can Haz Glock?

Well, like I alluded on Tuesday, I went over to the dark side. I now own a Glock semi-automatic pistol. I picked up a G30, which for those who aren't familiar with the Glock numbering system is the subcompact, double-stack .45 ACP. There's also a single-stack version (the G36), and a full-size (the G21), but no mid-sized .45 ACP Glock akin to the Model 19/23 (9mm/.40 S&W).

Why did I succumb, you ask? Well, it was a perfect storm of opportunity. First off, the price was right. I checked GunBroker and GunsAmerica for the going price of used G30s around the country, and what I paid was definitely on the low side. The gun is used, but LNIB. It's got night sights (don't ask me what brand, these things are new to me!) and came with box, paperwork (unopened!) and two magazines (9 round flush and 10 round with pinkie extension).

As I said, the price was a deciding factor. The gun was very reasonably priced - for Free America.

Y'see, here in MA there's a two-tiered system for getting handguns approved for sale. First, the manufacturer has to submit every model they want to sell for testing, which apparently involves beating a Ming vase into powder with the handgun due to the cost. Once a pistol is approved, it is listed on the Approved Firearm Roster. Now, right here, you'd think that this pistol could be sold. You'd be wrong. The Attorney General can, at his or her discretion, disallow sales of an approved firearm based on, well... we can't quite figure out what that's based on. Looking at the roster, there's a whole bunch of approved Glocks; however for some unknown reason new Glock handguns cannot be sold to the general public.

It's stupid, arbitrary, and yet another roadblock to gun ownership. In other words, par for the course in Massa-fucking-chusetts.





Anyways, like the man said, I told you all that, so I can tell you this: I got it cheap. Damn cheap. About $200 cheaper than the price that 9mm and .40 S&W subcompact Glocks currently command in MA. Basically, I figured that I could pick it up, shoot it, see how I liked it, and sell it for a hefty profit should I not like it.

So why the G30? As weer'd beard points out in my hint post, I was looking for a thinner carry piece, not a fatter one... Well... I'm willing to make concessions to get 10+1 rounds of .45 ACP. That right there's enough to change my tune a bit...


.45 ACP. Dispatching goblins and Moro warriors since 1905. Nothing says "sucking chest wound" like a .45" jacketed hollowpoint. Which, coincidentally, you can see in great detail looking down that big ol' barrel...

There aren't a lot of small(ish) .45 ACP handguns available in MA - there's the S&W Chief's Special CS45, which is comparably sized to the G30, but with 4 less rounds, and the ParaOrdnance Warthog, which again is similarly sized to the G30. However, I know 3 or 4 people who have owned (notice the past tense) Warthogs and every single person has gotten rid of it, claiming it's too unreliable to use as a carry gun.

One complaint I've never heard about Glock is that they're unreliable. Ugly? Sure. Soulless? Granted. But even the most ardent Glock-hater will concede that they run well in even the most demanding conditions...

That's it for small .45s available new. Sure, you can find a used Colt Defender, but you'd better be prepared to drop $1K or more. Kimber's ultra compact? Raid the kids' college funds...




We've got the inevitable schwag picture:





And, as you probably guessed from the item propping the trigger guard, I had a little fun with the "Tupperware" appellation for Glock:

Heh. I couldn't resist.


One really, really neat thing about the G30? Apparently Smith & Wesson/Walther copied the subcompact Glock when they designed their SW99/P99 series, because 4 out of 5 holsters that I bought for my SW99 compact fit the G30. The Fobus paddle holster actually fits better - I believe it technically is a Glock holster. The two IWB holsters, a generic nylon and a Don Hume leather, both fit the G30. And, most impressively, the Crossbreed Supertuck IWB holster I got for the SW99 (pictured here with the SW99 compact 9mm) fits the G30 like it was made for it...

That's an unexpected bonus - buy a new CCW piece, be able to use existing gear. More money for extra magazines!

Now I just need to find some pre-ban G21 13-round magazines!

That is all.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Live-Blogging Vice Presidential Debate...

Okay... The debate is about to begin.

We're about to see just how slanted the coverage is going to be - I'm genuinely curious to see how Gwen Ifill, who you will recall has a vested financial interest in seeing Obama win, moderates this debate.

That said... Let the games begin. I've got my laptop, a large glass of Diet Coke at the ready, and the TV tuned to Fox News...

Will Sarah Palin prove her detractors right and flub this debate, showing she's not ready for prime time?

Will Joe Biden taste shoe leather yet again?

We shall see...



I thought this was starting at 9:00? What the heck?!?!?



Hi, I'm Gwen Ifill. I tripped on my bias on the way in...



And left on Funk & Wagnall's porch overnight...



Gee, Biden won the coin toss. Didn't see THAT coming...



Mumble into your chest some more, plagiarist...



What's with the "um"s, Joe? You watch Bill Clinton's speeches much?



And now, we hear from Chief Gunderson...



Stay away from the wonk, Sarah!



Wow, Palin looks like a caribou in the headlights.

Biden has a perma-scowl...



Joe Biden is going to try to show that the Obama administration is going to be better for women than John McCain and "that broad with the big rack from Alaska"...



Yes! Hit Obama's "voting" record and partisanship! Would have been nice to hear "Chicago political machine"....



Oh boy. Subprime mortgages... Tread carefully. Don't blame the idiot proles who bought McMansions while working McJobs...



Comment from sci-fi: Wonder if Biden needed a bellboy to carry the bags under his eyes...



Two years ago Obama was getting wined & dined by Fannie Mae...

Commenter B notes that Biden looks older than McCain...

Exact quote: "The lighting on Biden makes him look like a corpse"



'Cuz when I think tax relief, I think of socialists who idolize Che Guevara...



YES!!! 94 times! Obama voted to raise taxes 94 times... BAM!



I love the way she says "corrected"...



Wow, Biden had his dentures bleached...



"Health Class Warfare"? WTF?



Joe, you wouldn't know fairnesss if it hit you over the head with a 2X4...



Three hundred million billion dollars, eh Joe? Moron.



YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES!

Small businesses! WHAMMO! Good one, Sarah!

And she comes off the third turnbuckle with the "patriotic" slam!!!



Veering into Wonk-a-land, Sarah...



What's he doing with his fingers? He looks like one of the Wiggles...



"Slow down"... Now there's a euphemism, Joe... Just what else do you want to "slow down"???

And Joe takes a trip to Wonk-a-land.

BUSINESSES DON'T PAY TAXES. They merely collect them. Please, for the love of all that's good and holy, let Sarah STUFF this down his neck...



Back to "unpatriotic". Not gonna work, Joe. He's clearly rattled - maybe he had one in the bags under his eyes...



YES! Obama voted for the oil company "tax breaks"! Slam!



"My state". YES. Push the exec experience, something you have and none of the other candidates do...



Biden looks like he just swallowed a turd...



Wait a minute. Obama voted something other than "present"???

...

Since 2001. Interesting benchmark, Joe. Wasn't Obama working as a "community organizer" then?



I'm still waiting for Biden to scream "Get these squirrels off me"...



HIT THE CONNECTION BETWEEN OBAMA'S CAMPAIGN AND FANNIE MAE!!!!!!!!!!!!



Barack Obama's a pessimist! Glass is half-full.

Yeah, he pointed it out while having dinner with Fannie Mae execs...



How many Fannie Mae big wigs wound up working on Obama's campaign? There were as many execs as years Senate experience Obama has...



He looks SO creepy when he smiles like that. MAN! I'm scared...



She's totally got the beauty queen smile going. I'll bet there's vasoline on those pearly whites...



Climate change. This ought to be good...



Talk about the polar bears... About hunting polar bears... heh...



Joe, the list of things you don't understand is long and distinguished...

Maybe the ice caps are melting from polar bear farts (t/p sci-fi)

We could stop greenhouse gases if you'd shut your piehole, Joe...

Not only the atmosphere, but the west coast???? Hello?? Does he think the west coast has its own atmosphere?



Sarah, Sarah, Sarah... Please do not move around and say "drill, baby, drill". The laptop is moving again...



Wow, Joe, that is a WICKED used car salesman smile...

When they burn their dirty coal... ? {Hank Hill} Whut the hell? Joe Biden just turned into Boomhauer...



From sci-fi: Joe Biden has cornered the market on "Walter Mondale mojo"...



Sarah - PLEASE say "get the government out of the marriage business"...



Uh, Sarah? Talking about how tolerant you are... It's like saying "some of my best friends are ___"...



Let's get to the Second Amendment, shall we?

...

Foreign policy. This ought to be interesting...



Palin's exit strategy... IT'S A TRAP! Don't get bogged down in exit strategy.



OH NO! Palin just said "early withdrawal"!!! Laptop's moving again...



Obama's offered a clear plan - RUN AWAY!!!



Yeah! Let those lazy-assed Iraqis get off their duffs!

Barack and Biden put the "fun" in fundamentalist! (sci-fi)

Ugh. Get off that tangent, Sarah... You're not debating Obama.



And Palin says... PULL! BLAM! Joe "lame duck" Biden hit amidships!

YES! Respect the family and his support.

WOW, could Biden possibly sound more derisive???



NO ONE ever said it would a day, or a week, or six months, Joe.



That's the only time you'll "Barack Obama" and "right" in the same sentence...

Iran. This ought to be good.

Oh, yeah, Pakistan. That's the place Obama wants to invade, right?



Oh no. Nuc-u-lar! PROOF she's in bed with Bush!



Please, Sarah, refer to him as "Dinner Jacket"...

The Castro Brothers? Is that like Mario Brothers?



Passion for diplomacy? Hell no. Roll the B-52s...

...

There's the Crazy Biden's Used Car smile...

...

Is it just me, or are they deliberately panning away from Biden during his more crazy moments?

...

We should talk with them, yes. After they've been bombed into submission.

WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT??? Talk... talk... talk... Is he trying to hypnotize us???



His voice is cracking... Danger... We're losing containment on the Biden-bot!

...

The solution to pollution is dilution! No, wait...

How about "we'll talk about a separate state when they stop talking about wiping Israel off the map"???

...

AUGH! She got Jordan and Egypt, but forgot to mention Libya!



No one's been a better friend than Joe Biden? Biden's channeling Bob Dole here...

...

Anyone got a clue what the hell he's talking about?



Could he mention "abject failure" a couple zillion more times? (Mrs. G).



Oh yes, because if there's one thing Hamas does, it's sit and listen to gobble gobble gobble from statesmen... IDIOT.



"I haven't heard..." That's because your head's been so far up Obama's ass you've had to unbutton his pants to breath...



She's got that little head shake going. She looks annoyed. She looks like she's about to go after Biden with a gut hook...



Talking about Obama talking about the military bombing civilians. "Reckless comment". Yes!

...

Biden has turned into Charlie Brown's teacher. WOH-WAH-WONT-WAH-WAH



Let me consult my cheat sheet...

Mumble into your chest some more, Joe...

He looks like he's kicked in the nuts.

(B says, "he looks like he's been kicked like a puppy")



Kosovo? Don't we still have troops stationed there, Joe?

Isn't that an "abysmal failure" using your criteria?



Rally the world to act? Oh, my aching ass!

...

Comment from Mrs. G. "Can I get a picture of you for my ADHD poster?"

I'm sitting here with the TV on, typing on the laptop, talking to sci-fi on the phone... Yes, I am the poster child for attention deficit dis- HEY! Let's go ride our bikes!



Comment from Mrs. G: "Palin's mouth is crooked" Response from sci-fi: "yeaaaahhhhh"...



Genocide? No, no, no. Albright told us it was only "genocide-like"...



Oh NO! Back to drilling in Alaska!

...

OH SHUT THE FUCK UP you pompous ass.



What does going after bin Laden have to do with drilling in Alaska?

...

I want Palin to respond: I have five kids. Obviously I support drilling in Alaska.

...

My G-D, Biden is rambling...

...

YES!!! She's admitted to differences with McCain. Have we heard Biden do anything other than give Obama a rim-job?



Your neighborhood is DC, Joe. Drop the act, you bastard.



TOO... MUCH... HOMESPUN... GOODNESS...

(Very clever, says Mrs. G.)

Palin just turned into Chief Gunderson again. Don't get much more middle class than that!

...

Bad fucking idea, trying to out-middle class the woman whose husband is a COMMERCIAL-FUCKING-FISHERMAN.



"John McCain has tapped me"????

Wow...

She's cracking Biden up here... (and the audience).

Oh please. The role of the Vice-President is to wait for the President to buy it...

...

Joe, doesn't it bother you that you've got like, what, 10X the Senate experience of Obama?



Oh, those Founding Fathers sure were wise, dontcha know?

Man... She *is* Marge Gunderson...



Biden looked like a racehorse getting his teeth inspected. I think he actually had part of a salt lick stuck between his teeth.

OH SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Cheney's only dangerous if you hunt with him (Mrs. G)



He *is* Charlie Brown's teacher. Wonh-wah-wah-wonh waaaaah...

...

"Words are useless darling, all this gobble gobble gobble". Yes, Joe Biden is Edna Mode...

...

She keeps coming back to "tapped"... I think subliminally she wants me...

(err, um, just kidding dear!)



Okay, this is just weird. I'm talking with sci-fi on the phone. His wife B just laughed at something Mrs. G. just said...



Did she just say "tapped" again?



Biden looks like Sam the Eagle from the Muppets...



Interesting that gun control never came up...



Is Biden BRAGGING on National TV while the economy falters???



PLEASE... Say "Change is all you're going to have once Obama's tax increases go through"...



His eyes are turning into little slits. He looks like someone from Pokemon...



Final question...

C'mon... GUN CONTROL!



Huh? Oh, I'm sorry. Biden just bored me to sleep for a moment...

...

BLAH. BLAH. Blah-diddy-blah... BLAH BLAH.

(Oh, that's what I'm hearing right now...)

This man makes Joe Lieberman look lively...



What the HELL did he just say???

WHAT? He didn't question people's motives??? ASSAULT WEAPON BAN, BEE-YOTCH?



WONK WONK WONK! Danger Will Robinson!

...

Gwen, I want to thank you for not hawking your book too blatantly...



Oh knock it off... Most important election... Yeah, if you support gun rights - vote against Obama and Biden...



Uh, Joe? Health care and education are not RIGHTS. We have no fucking guarantee to either.

...

And my dad used to say, if the dog hadn't stopped to shit, he'd have caught the rabbit. What's your fucking point Joe?


Okay. Looks like that's all she wrote.

Think it's time to cap the Wild Turkey and put this to bed...

That is all.

Watch This Space...

I'm planning/hoping to live-blog the VP debate tonight.

Assuming I still have some bourbon in the house, that is...

I figure that someone's gotta document the bias, and it might as well be me. No need to thank me, it's just a service we offer...

That is all.

Sunday Go To Meeting Boy...

I just signed The Boy up for Confraternity of Christian Doctrine (abbreviated and more commonly known as CCD, a.k.a. Sunday School for the non-Catholics). Classes start at the end of the month - nothing like waiting until the last minute, eh Jay?

He was supposed to start last year, but I never got around to signing him up. Sure, part of it was gross laziness on my part, both in the "dragging our asses out of bed on Sunday" sense and also the "I can wait another week to call for information" laziness. But it wasn't just laziness - I was honestly conflicted.

Now, I'm just as conflicted now, but I want my kids to go to church. It's an important part of a lot of people's lives, and I want them to have that experience. I refuse to repeat the lessons of my parents and simply drop them off @ the church for service, telling them "you have to go" but not going with them (or, when my little sister went, she only had to go to CCD).

So...

I've got some questions I'm hopin' y'all can help me with:

What should I expect when I take my son to church for the first time?

He's a normal seven-year old boy, which is to say he's clinically insane and his butt won't sit still for more than 8 nanoseconds. I'm going to a new church (new to me) with a new priest/congregation/etc., so I have absolutely no idea what to expect. I'm planning on getting there early, sitting in the back, and being ready to bolt at the first sign of impending Boy meltdown...

How much information should I give him before our first mass?

The Catholic mass is confusing enough on its own - stand/sit/kneel; sing, chant, pray; shake hands, receive communion, pass the plate. I don't want to give him too much information, so that he starts worrying about it; on the other hand, I don't want to just walk in cold. I also haven't been to a mass in about, oh, a good decade or so... I'd guess there's probably a bunch of information out there about your kids' first time at church...

Which church should I bring him to for his first mass?

The local church, the one I went to growing up, still has one mass every Sunday even though they don't do CCD any more. However, it would make more sense to attend the mass that he'll be going to before CCD at the new church. Would it mess him up to attend a couple weeks' worth of services at one church and then start attending a new church regularly?

I think that's about it for now. I'm sure I'll have a bunch of new questions after his first church experience...

That is all.

The Life You Save...

...Might just be your own.

Note to the CRV that cut me off: The reason I was "tailgating you" was that you blew through the stop sign and CUT ME OFF. I was close to your bumper because you blew through the stop sign and CUT ME OFF. Stomping on your brakes because I was close to your bumper (because you blew through the stop sign and CUT ME OFF) is a great way to either get rear-ended by a vehicle more than thrice your size or get your head beaten in by a tire iron.

Learn how to drive, shit-for-brains, before you meet someone with crappier brakes and/or slower reaction time. Because that little tin shitbox isn't going to survive a collision with a 3-ton truck. And your ignorant ass might just get the kicking it so richly deserves. Fucknugget.

That is all.

Wanted: An Editor With A Brain...

Someone really ought to lose their job for this one. Here's the headline:

New Legislation Decriminalizes Child Prostitution

And here's the story:
SACRAMENTO -- Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill into law Sunday that would help young prostitutes. The legislation decriminalizes the actions of minors involved in the sex trade. Instead of punishing them, they would be treated as victims.

Currently, if a minor is picked up for prostitution, she is charged as a criminal and sent to juvenile. But this law would change that and connect young girls with counselors and services they need. The law would also help girls who want to bring charges against a pimp.

That's a world apart from decriminalizing child prostitution right there. That's either very sloppy editing or outright manipulation at worst... The headline sure as hell sounds like CA was about to stop prosecuting people who frequent child prostitutes, which is obviously not the case...

In cases like this you have to wonder if it's intentional; if the editor deliberately stated it this way to draw attention to the story and make you read it. In that case, he should get the hell out of editing and into marketing...

That is all.

Wait For It...

I'm wonder how long it will take before we see some variation of the following headline:

PALIN DIDN'T VOTE FOR BAILOUT!!!111

I mean, hell, if Pelosi can get away with excoriating Republicans for not attending a meeting they weren't invited to (hat tip to Bruce), why not?

Why the hell not? I mean, it's not like other media outlets would challenge them, right? Why not be bold, and just start making shit up out of whole cloth? It's all for the greater good of ensuring Comrade Obama wins the election, right?

Once again, I hate these people because they are going to force me to vote for John Fucking McCain. Their tactics are so underhanded, so despicable, that the only possible course of action for someone who can't tolerate the blatant lies is to vote against their chosen one...

That is all.

Teh Funny...

My blogson wins teh internetz with this post. Made of Win!

Pinky and the Brain. Funny, funny stuff...

That is all.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Only After Chili...

Just realized that "MArooned" can be re-arranged to spell "Mean Odor".

Random factoid of the afternoon brought to you by the Anagram Generator at Wordsmith.org...

That is all.

Heartless Neanderthals...

So, I was listening to Gun Nuts last night, and participating in the chat forum that accompanies the show, when Turk Turon came into chat to give us the sad news about Tam's cat passing away.

And you know what happened? Every single person in that chat room immediately surfed over to Tam's website to post condolences. All of those bitter, clingy gun owners, who had previously been debating types of ammunition and general home defense, were falling over themselves to help out a friend who was hurting. 104 comments so far, and they're continuing to flood in.

Imagine that. Gun owners. Caring for one of their own in need. Just like normal people...

That is all.

Best. Concept. EVAH!

AC/DC Radio.

Sadly, it's only a limited engagement.

There's just something about all AC/DC, all the time...

That is all.

Such A Dork...

Can I help it that I howled at this?



Hi, my name is Jay, and I'm a nerd...

That is all.

Nope, No Bias to See Here...

Heard on the morning news about the fawning, pro-Obama book that VP debate moderator Gwen Ifill is producing.

I then googled "vice president debate moderator", and found exactly two sources confirming this - Michelle Malkin at Hot Air, and an article at W0rld Net Daily. That's it - two admittedly partisan sources. Literally no other news articles in the first two pages of Google hits.

Contrast this with the coverage of the Democratic candidates for refusing to participate in debates covered by Fox News. Plenty of press there...

And yet, the person moderating the only debate between the two vice-presidential candidates has written a book about one of the presidential candidates, a position affording her significant access to one side of the campaign. And this is supposed to be a "fair" debate.

Right.

I wonder how the questions are going to run?

[Ifill] Senator Biden, when Barack Obama wins next month, he's going to give every child in America a pony, and every adult will receive a new Lexus. Just how awesome is Barack Obama? Can you explain in 5 or 10 minutes, or should I give you 20?

[Palin] Excuse me, but -

[Ifill] And that's all the time we have for the evil environment-killing, baby's blood-drinking, Big Oil loving Rethuglican side of the debate.

That is all.

Happy Birthday!

To the car that started it all, the Ford Model T...


Yep. The car that Henry Ford proclaimed one could have in any color "as long as it's black" first rolled off the assembly line 100 years ago today.

100 years.

Bet they're still trying to get the transmission fixed on the first model year...

That is all.