Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Safety or Stupidity?

There's currently an uproar in our sleepy little burg. We learned at dinner time that our childrens' school has instituted a "lockdown" policy when an "unauthorized" person is discovered in the school building. The children are to remain in their classrooms, and are instructed to move to a location away from windows along a wall (or so I could gather from my kindergartener and my second grader; take from that what you will).

Apparently they had a "Code Red" drill (that's what they announce over the loudspeaker when the "unauthorized" person is discovered) today, because that's what the kids told us happened at school today. We were not informed of this policy at all, no notes home from the school administation, no notice in the weekly Communicator (the notices they send home with all the school-related news like school lunches, field trips, etc).

Now, first off, I have a fundamental problem with the "ostrich" instructions, namely that that is precisely the mentality that brought about 32 dead at Virginia Tech. All staying put does is make you an easier target for the nutjob with a grudge against the world and a Glock. I'd much rather the policy be "When you heard Code Red, run like the little sugar-fueled maniacs you are".

However, I am not so naïve as to ignore the glaring problems with this plan, particularly the difficulty in practicing (yeah, you want to chase after 175+ high-velocity elementary school kids?) as well as walking the razor-thin line between scaring them unnecessarily and not giving them enough information to make their own informed decisions. The devil is in the details; where's the happy medium between "huddle in the corner and hope he runs out of ammo before he gets to you" and "run like a startled gazelle into the woods behind the school so you can eventually die of hypothermia"?

I also wonder if the "huddle in the corner" plan was chosen for ease of implementation. It's pretty simple to tell the kids to get in position and don't move if the Code Red is called. They can document the plan, have twice-yearly drills, and fulfill the requirements for the lockdown plan that was required after the Columbine shootings. It's a lot hard to properly document the "run at maximum velocity in 1,500 directions" policy and even harder to practice it.

And, finally, in the statistical analysis, they're not bloodly likely to encounter a real school shooter scenario. They're more likely to have someone try to get past the front office, in which case the lockdown/Code Red and resultant plan is pretty solid - the Code goes out, the teachers lock the classroom doors, the police are called, the "unauthorized" person is located and removed from the scene. It's a small town. The cops know everyone, and I'd wager in case of an intruder at the school they'd be on site in less than 4-5 minutes.

It just irks me that the first I hear of it is AFTER the first drill. A quick note in the Communicator stating that the school would be instituting the lockdown policy and having a drill in the near future would have been nice. Better still, of course, would be to have an information night in conjunction with the police department to answer questions and calm fears - not to mention quelling rumors.

There's no real good answer here. There are lots of unanswered questions.

That is all.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

This kind of thing is representative of what total Wussies many Americans have become over the last 20 years or so.

Really, it's embarrassing as well as sad. We institute whole policies and laws to "protect" us from some event which has a statistical likelihood approaching zero.

I wish we'd hear more people telling people to stop being wimps and suck it up. No one wants a tragedy, but life isn't safe. There's never a guarantee no matter how many laws or drills we have.

As a parent I'm particularly bothered by this because I think kids need to be as free to explore and simply be kids as is reasonable given the circumstances. We've cocooned our children into tiny little plastic bubbles for a generation now, removing them from all the opportunities for growth and development of their own selves in the name of safety because we won't accept the simple fact that nothing in life is a guarantee of safety.

We go the Europe a lot and on 7/7, when London got bombed, all my friends there, including a guy who actually takes the same train that got hit to work every day, were just "ho-hum" within a day. (Mike missed the bomb by about 15 minutes) They just sucked it up and went about their business. If anything it just hardened people's resolve. Americans on the other hand go into nationwide panic over just about anything.

As always, this is a "if the shoe fits" kind of thing. I know I'm speaking in generalities, but overall, yes, I think Americans have become wussified. We need to learn to suck it up and take our chances, not pretend that some goofy "drill" or throwing away the 4th or 2nd amendment is going to save us from all possible danger sources.

Anonymous said...

This policy, like most such dumbassery, is an excercise in CYA by Admin types trying to justify their paychecks...... they have to have a policy to cover every conceivable possibility, however unlikely...... that is what they get paid to do. And THAT is precisely why dumping more money into the system does not improve kids' education one whit: they'll fritter it away on similar stupidity.

Unknown said...

I won't comment on the fact that socialist states tend to feel they have greater authority to raise your children than you do.

You're already quite aware of the fact that you live in Massachusetts.

But there is an aspect I will train my children in. You grab a sharp object. Be it pencil, scissors, or a heavy object. It's not much of a defense. But it does at least prepare the mind to not be defenseless.

Jay G said...

Bill,

"Really, it's embarrassing as well as sad. We institute whole policies and laws to "protect" us from some event which has a statistical likelihood approaching zero."

Like banning assault weapons. Exactly.

jimbob86,

Bingo. They wanted a nice, neat little policy that they could trot out, have the kids practice, and check off the box that says "policy in place".

Whether or not it works at its intended aim is completely immaterial...

the saj,

Bingo. My response is simple: If you can, run. If you can't run, fight. Fight as hard as you possibly can.

I actually had someone tell me that if there were a situation at the school, I wouldn't be able to get anywhere near it.

I had to refrain from laughing at them...

TOTWTYTR said...

Jimbob86 is exactly right. My wife teaches in an urban high school in Rhode Island. Two weeks ago a kid was arrested in the classroom next to hers. He had 2,000 BBs, a CO2 powered gun, and a couple of packages of fireworks.

Not only did the school not have any sort of lock down, the teachers found out about the arrest by reading the local newspaper.

Two days later the administration decided to have a lockdown drill. Apparently the plan is to herd the kids (high schoolers) into the least unsafe corner of the classroom. There, my wife is supposed to shield them with her body (no, I'm not making this up) from potential gun fire.

Yeah, like that's a practical approach.

Personally, I'd rather they armed all of the teachers. At least then they'd have parity with the students.

Anonymous said...

Saj:
"But there is an aspect I will train my children in. You grab a sharp object. Be it pencil, scissors, or a heavy object. It's not much of a defense. But it does at least prepare the mind to not be defenseless."

As a parent, I'd rather not do anything but train the kid in the Scout Motto: "Be Prepared." That means for ANY unforeseen circumstance. But particular attention to a school shooting? That's just stupid and makes kids needlessly paranoid.

How many actual school shootings occur? And how many kids actually get shot in such events? Almost none. The hype is 10,000 times worse than the reality. Even if 500 kids died every year in such events, and that's a lot more than actually do, that's still what? Maybe 1/5000% likelihood in any given year?

Why are we being so scared all the time over what are mostly figments of the imagination?

Maybe we should stop teaching fear and start teaching and praising personal courage. That would do a lot more good for everyone than stupid "drills."

Christine G. said...

jay -- we found out on halloween evening as my son sat with us while we waited for trick or treaters.

he said that he will refuse to comply, that he will grab a chair and throw it at the person and kick his ass.

now, geoff... son. that's noble of you, but i think if the dude had a gun, you'd get as far as grabbing a chair. if you hide under a desk, you're an easy target, and it makes it so easy for the administration to count the dead if they're under their desks.

kind of like bomb shelters in the 50s. if everyone is in one place when they all get fried... well then we know where they all are and can count them after the fact and seal the building with concrete.

i admire my son's fearlessness, but think in reality he'll run around screaming like a girl if such a case ever arose.

i am MOSTLY pissed off that we had to hear this from our kids instead of being informed or asked to discussion by the superintendent or the principal. I'm offended and angered. i planned on writing him a letter, but my son did something today to get his ass in hot water so i'll just keep my mouth shut for now.

i'm not happy with this.

oh -- and they had an incident in beverly last week where the high school was on lockdown because someone brought bullets to school and put them in the bathroom on purpose so that he could disrupt the school day. He thought they'd all be dismissed. ha. they all got locked up for hours while the school was investigated.

kids will take this and run with it. i don't want to take these tests, so i'll write a threat on the wall, or put BBs in the cafeteria.

it's all so stupid.

Jay G said...

bill,

I don't think the_saj was necessarily saying it had to be limited to potential school shootings.

That's pretty good advice in *any* situation - grab whatever you have at hand and use it, if necessary.

It works if they're at the playground and a stranger tries to grab them and pull them into his car - yell, scream, squirm, pick up a rock, anything you can do.

amusings,

Fighting back might get you killed.

Huddling in a corner will get you killed.

Apparently there was some sort of incident in Newburyport last week as well, something about a "man with a gun" near the school. I think that's what triggered the new policy - given that the school was supposed to implement one in the aftermath of the 1999 Columbine shootings.

The method in which we were notified supremely pissed me off, too. I need to calm down, compose myself, and put my mad 'ritin' skillz to work...

Anonymous said...

Ya, I wasn't trying to go off on you Saj, and I apologize if I came across like that.

Really it's just a matter of being sick and tired of hearing fear from Govt. types all the time. I was really responding to the schools thing, who seem to be the worst culprits on this stuff.

Kevin said...

YARTH

Christine G. said...

i sent you email. we did get something sent home to us -- it was in the weekly communicator. but to be honest you needed a microscope to find it mixed in with the rest of the newsletter stuff.

ms. principal and i agreed to disagree. i have bigger fish to fry with her today with geoff. but i told her some email from the DISTRICT since i'm on a district emailing list, woulda been nice.