Saturday, January 15, 2011

Careful With That Flexible Flyer Eugene...

Sent in by PISSED.

Daredevils Ignore Sledding Ban At Raynham Hill

RAYNHAM (CBS) – Raynham school officials are trying to stop daredevils from sledding down a dangerous hill.

 Daredevils Ignore Sledding Ban At Raynham Hill

The hill behind Raynham Middle School (CBS)

“There’s nowhere else as good as this. This is the biggest hill,” explained a teenager who showed us the scrapes on his chin from a fall.

Their beef is, apparently that the hill empties into a parking lot, and kids sometimes don't stop in time and could potentially wind up in the parking lot where they could be hit by cars. Because of this, they've banned sledding on this hill. Rather than dump some hay bales at the edge of the parking lot, which would stop any sledders from touching pavement, they simply issued a ban and called it a day.

This is what's wrong with our society, folks.

We're too afraid to do something, anything, that might actually address the issue. See, if we out hay bales and some numbskull sleds between then and gets hit by a car, we could be liable! So we'll issue a blanket ban, call it a day, and just... um... hope that people obey it. We're so paralyzed by the fear of a lawsuit that - rather than take concrete action that will most likely solve the problem - we wind up paralyzed by fear and take the coward's way out. There. Sledding is banned. Now no one will ever get hurt on that hill, because it's not allowed.

Of course, when someone does go down the hill - and they will - and then gets hurt, what's left? Make it doubleplus banned? Extra banned? When your first instinct is to throw down the banhammer, it makes it hard to have further action. It's like the idiotic "Zero Tolerance" policies that expel kids for having a plastic knife in their lunchbox or a package of aspirin in their backpack - rather than have a policy with some degree of latitude, it's all or nothing - with no room whatsoever for common sense.

Bans like these accomplish many goals: They make the people at the heart of the ban (in this case, the teenagers going sledding) so inured to government overreach that they stop thinking about it. This allows the nanny state to grow unfettered by questioning voices. The second thing it does is it allows a wider net for lawbreakers, turning people who would otherwise be perfectly law-abiding folks into criminals. The divide between the police and the general public grows wider, as Officer Friendly is forced to arrest young Jimmy for the heinous crime of... sledding? Imagine that call: "We need you to come down to the station and bail out your child. He committed the crime of sledding without a license." It's hard to see just what good they hope to accomplish here...

Then again, this is MA: Leave your common sense at the door.

That is all.

10 comments:

Stan said...

How fast are these people driving in the parking lot that there is a real concern of someone hitting a kid?

The hay bales are of course a good idea but I wonder how much of a danger there really is without them.

Rev. Paul said...

Perhaps they could put up a snow fence; if anyone goes through it, the school could point out that it wasn't for sledders, but to stop snowdrifts across the parking lot. Plausible deniability & all that. That's how we do it here.

Oh wait - it's MA. I keep forgetting.

Eck! said...

The easy way...

You don't put hay bales to hit at the end you spread the hay for a band about 12-16 ft wide so that you get slowed before you get to the lot.

This works and doesn't much up the runners and you cant hit it head on.

Right it's MA.. I forgot being a kid from LI.

Eck!

New Jovian Thunderbolt said...

Just say, "stay off this property" and be done with. Don't add "but it's for the CHILDREN!" to it.

Oh it's not their property but the 'public's'? Fine. Then keep your nose out of it.

New Jovian Thunderbolt said...

Busybodies...

Ancient Woodsman said...

How dare anyone have any fun at all within 1000 feet of any school! When I was aboy one of our favorite runs ended at a busy road - you had to time your run to coicide with traffic so - gee whiz - you didn't get run over. Oddly enough, we all lived to tell about it. Sad to think we wouldn't try to instill our children with survival skills like learning to think for themselves.

The single person sleds aren't nearly as dangerous as the high-capacity multi-seat toboggans.

Don't you need an FID (fun inclement-weather device) card to have a sled in MA anyway? If so, confiscating the little sleds from known owners should be a piece of cake.

Oh, wait; they're probably buying their Flexible Flyers in one of those other states with no such requirements.

Gosh, this whole thing is a vicious circle, isn't it?

Old NFO said...

Ya know, seeing this just makes me wonder how WE survived childhood without all the rules and regulations... Oh yeah... that common sense (most of the time) thing...

Butch Cassidy said...

Dangerous hill?

What the...What does it do? Steal kids' lunch money? Give them ebola?

Oh yeah, it sits there, being inanimate. Martha, bring the kids to the cellar; thar be evil afoot!

My front deck looks across a river valley and into the hills on the other side. Every day, I can see them there, plotting...

wolfwalker said...

Rather than dump some hay bales at the edge of the parking lot, which would stop any sledders from touching pavement, they simply issued a ban and called it a day.

Of course. Buying some bales of straw (better than hay for this purpose) would cost money. Issuing a ban doesn't.

As you've said before, it's all about the Benjamins. Dead presidents will trump common sense every time.

Mushroom22 said...

"When sleds are outlawed, only outlaws will have sleds".
...It's only a matter of time before the peoples' republik requires a permit for this dangerous mode of transportation.