Monday, May 21, 2012

In Defense of the Pocket Pistol...

With summer rapidly approaching, more folks are starting to transition to pocket carry in the warmer weather. With the mosquitoes and black flies of summer (okay, late spring on the black flies...), a reminder of the warm weather, some toters find themselves paring down the carry hardware to something that can be hidden in a pocket - and along with that, someone will be commenting that if you can carry a pocket gun, you can carry a "real" gun.

Now, I understand the line of thinking here; heck, I used to espouse it. Never carry a handgun in a caliber that doesn't start with "4" and end in "5", right? If six rounds of .38 Special is good, then 18 rounds of 9mm is 3X better, right? A gun with a full sized grip in a "major" caliber is what you want on your side if the ball drops and things go all pear shaped, right? Something that'll put the bad guys down at 25 yards is what you need, either a full sized 1911 or a wundernine with eleventy billion round capacity.

See, the problem I kept running into was that those guns tend to stay home in the safe, whereas something like these:


would be far more likely to come along for the trip. I don't carry the Colt Jr., but there's a lot of folks out there that'll toss a Baby Browning or Beretta Jetfire in their pockets on a hot summer's day. The other two find themselves in near-constant rotation from about this time of year through September - basically any time that a cover garment would be suspect or just too darn hot.

The fact of the matter is that, statistically speaking, all handgun calibers suck. If you were really concerned about threats, you'd carry a rifle - or, better yet, barricade yourself in your armored home with something in the minigun family. But since we do tend to venture outside of the home on occasion, and toting a rifle is frowned upon in many locations, we wind up carrying handguns. And the facts of the matter are that, statistically speaking, *any* gun is better than no gun, and *any* handgun caliber is going to require multiple hits to a specific area to have any effect.

Whether that round is a .380 ACP, 9mm, or .45 ACP is of far lesser importance than a) having the gun on you in the first place, and b) being able to shoot it sufficiently well that you can make the best use of the gun's capacity. Insert old saw about "the .22 you have on you is better than the .44 at home in the safe" or "a hit with a .32 beats a miss with a .45". Having a firearm - any firearm - on your person with which you are reasonably proficient and prepared to use will greatly increase your chances of surviving the worst - whether that firearm is a .32 or a .44 Magnum.


Just be sure to actually carry it - and try to take it to the range sometimes, too!

That is all.

13 comments:

Lissa said...

The correct caliber is the one you have with you when the shit hits the fan.

Also, it's FUCKING HARD to hide a full-sized pistol under maternity clothing. Sure, it tends towards caftan-shape, but the material is all thin and there are no waistbands!

ASM826 said...

This line of reasoning lead me to my latest purchase, a DB, which will pocket carry in a pair of shorts and is still a 9mm.

A bit more than a .380 and I didn't have to pick up having another caliber to plan for.

bluesun said...

I'd say take it to the range more often than any of your other guns, and exercise your hand strength while you're at it. They are good tools and I love my j-frame, but they do take more effort to shoot proficiently...

Dave H said...

Greg Ellifritz, a law enforcement firearms and defensive trainer in Ohio, studied a bunch of civilian, LEO, and military defensive shooting events and came up with some interesting statistics. (His report is here. He talks a fair bit about incapacitation, making the attacker stop, which is the whole point of a defensive weapon. Whether the goblin died, fainted, ran away, or soiled himself all counts as a stop.

If you look at the graph of average number of rounds to incapacitate, you see that it runs from about 1.2 for a shotgun, 1.4 for a rifle or a .22, up to about 2.4 for a 9mm or a .40 S&W. (Ellifritz notes that since 9s and .40s are usually semi-autos, the defender is able to shoot faster and more likely to use 2 shots where 1 might have been enough.) So there's not a lot of difference in effectiveness among the usual defensive calibers, and even a small gun carries enough rounds to make a difference.

The other graph I thought was interesting was the failure to incapacitate by caliber. This is the percentage of the number of times someone armed with a given caliber failed to stop an attack. It doesn't count number of hits or number of shots fired, just what caliber was used. Mouse gun calibers (.22, .25, and .32 which was the worst) failed the most, 30% to 40% of the time. When you get to the larger calibers, the failure rate drops by half. .38 Special failed rate was about 17%, and .357 Magnum was the winner at about 9%. The .380 was about 16%.

Long story short (too late, I know), I think six rounds of .380 still beats four aces.

BornLib said...

“The key is to hit them hard, hit them fast, and hit them repeatedly. The one shot stop is a unit of measurement not a tactical philosophy.” Evan Marshall

BenC said...

That is basically what happened with me I bought the M&P 40c but found the discomfort and hassle of carrying it to be such that I wasn't carrying it much.I bought the Bodyguard .380 and I carry it all the time.

Ed said...

Check out what is available for pocket guns:

http://www.mouseguns.com/PocketAutoComparison.p

You should be able to find something that will work for you.

Ed said...

Let's try posting that link correctly this time:

http://www.mouseguns.com/PocketAutoComparison.pdf

Lokidude said...

Hence my little Beretta. Sure, I can drop my snub .357 IWB, or strap on a 1911, but putting the Tomcat into my back pocket is just too handy to pass up.

Exurbankevin said...

My old office wasn't a no-gun zone, but it weren't a gun zone either. There was nothing in the employee handbook about not allowing guns, so they didn't ask and I didn't tell.

So I carried a P3AT in a strong side pocket holster, and no one ever knew better.

Would I have wanted to carry my CZ with me? Sure. But you do what you can, not what you should, and business casual and full size pistols just don't play nice with each other.

God, Gals, Guns, Grub said...

Gun Fighting Rule #1: Have a gun...

Dann in Ohio

RevGreg said...

During the summer I'd much rather toss the Micro Desert Eagle in pocket holster than have to worry about having to dress to conceal a larger weapon. The gun you have with you is ALWAYS better than the gun you don't and being able to quickly and easily transition if I change into shorts while out somewhere etc. is a big plus.

TOTWTYTR said...

Lissa wins the prize. The gun you have, any gun, is going to be more effective than the ones locked in your safe.

I can't comment about the maternity thing, I never needed to wear those 'cause I hardly showed. ;)