Thursday, November 18, 2010

What Gun Control Looks Like...

It looks like this:



Elderly Lynn woman attacked by thieves outside home

LYNN, Mass. -- An elderly Lynn woman was left bruised and bandaged after two thieves attacked her outside of her home and stole her purse on Monday.

“I’m not feeling good. I’ll be truthful with you, I’m aching all over, but that will take a few weeks and I’ll be fine,” said Geneva Sozanski, who was attacked outside her home.

Sozanski has her head bandaged and is now suffering from a concussion. She can’t believe that she was attacked in her driveway, all because someone wanted that great grandmother’s purse.

Knocked unconscious over the contents of her purse. An 89 year old great grandmother suffered a concussion because some lowlife scumbag felt that the money in her purse was worth more than her life - had that good Samaritan not happened by, who's to say she would have been found before she bled to death? What kind of person viciously beats an 89 year old woman so badly that she loses consciousness?

This is what the gun-grabbers would have as the default. They would prefer that the young and the strong rule the roost; that those who would beat an old woman unconscious for the few dollars in her purse be the ones that call the shots. Make no mistake - you take away the tools for self defense and it becomes downright Darwinian - only the strong survive. What chance does an 89 year old woman have against two young male thugs? Well, as evidenced here, very little.

This is what happens when law-abiding folks are denied the basic right of self-defense. We are stripped of the best tools with which to defend ourselves, and as a result, the strong and brutal take what they want and to hell with everyone else. Women, who are generally smaller than their male counterparts? Well, you're fresh out of luck. Same goes for the elderly, or the handicapped, or kids. You can't hold your own against a drug-addled 20 year old male? Oh well. Better hope they only want your money.

We've heard enough from the Bradys and Million Moms and Diane Feinstein to know that they want nothing less that the full and complete revocation of the Second Amendment. They would love to see a UK-style gun ban, where handguns are completely forbidden and rifles are insanely regulated, such that firearms are completely off the table as method of self defense. In some bizarro-land dream world, they figure that by banning all guns, criminals will somehow magically stop being thugs, and we'll all live in peace and harmony, singing Kumbaya and wearing hemp. In the real world, thugs continue to be thugs and will assault, beat, rape, and kill people with the same animal ferocity as before - we'll just have to engage them at their level than from a position of strength.

A very wise man opined that "the gun is civilization". A famous truism was coined: "God created man, Sam Colt made them equal." - truer words have not been spoken. The only thing that could spare someone like Mrs. Sozanski a savage beating at the hands of feral thugs is a firearm. While some might advocate pepper spray or other "less than lethal" alternatives, the deterrent factor (call it the "Get Off My Lawn" factor) of a large bore firearm speaks the universal language of overwhelming force that is the only thing a goblin understands. Anything less puts the victim at a disadvantage - less-than-lethal, knives, or blunt objects require strength and proximity to be effective. Not as much of an issue for someone like your humble host; a major stumbling block to a nearly 90 year old great-grandmother...

Predators see only prey and threats - take away the talons and fangs, and all those predators see are food.

That is all.

Link sent by PISSED, who was about as upset as I was about this story.

8 comments:

Veeshir said...

they figure that by banning all guns, criminals will somehow magically stop being thugs,

I don't know, I think it's more about power coupled with a profound disinterest in the welfare of those affected.

You see, they want you to have to turn to the gov't for all protection.
If that means that a few old ladies get beaten, well, that's a price they're willing to pay.

Joel W. said...

I'm 64 and gimped up. My days of fighting off thugs with my bare hands are over. Out of my cold, dead fingers ... ya know what I mean?

Mike W. said...

As someone who has seen his 87 year old grandpa put in the hospital twice by muggers this shit just pisses me off.

Oh, and both attacks occurred in Gun Free New York City.

Sevesteen said...

But allowing guns isn't going to change attitudes. The old lady who lives in the building next door had her previous home invaded, was robbed and stuffed in her own trunk and left there. She is afraid to go out after dark. Wife and I asked if she had considered getting a carry license--she gave a distasteful look and said "a gun wouldn't have done me any good".

Jay G said...

It may not change *her* attitude, that is true.

But it may change the attitude of the next senior over, who proceeds to put neat .45" holes through the next goblin that jumps him.

Thus making goblins think twice...

Sevesteen said...

I'm all for goblins getting ventilated--especially if they mug old ladies. I think Ohio's shall-issue carry license process is too expensive and elitist.

I guess the point I was trying to make is that we need to get rid of the attitude that fighting back is pointless or somehow wrong--The best tools are useless without the willingness to use them.

Jay G said...

Agreed 100%.

Brad_in_IL said...

Jay,
Just heard on NECN that the sub-human worthless piece of walrus dung who likely committed this heinous act has been caught and is now in police custody. I hope this goes to trial and big-strong bad-boy gets a bull-queer roomie who stands about 6'8" and is names cupcake.