Toy Guns Becoming A Criminal Offense?
DETROIT (WWJ) – State lawmakers are currently reviewing legislation that targets the use of certain toy guns. A planned proposal before the Senate would make it a crime to possess a toy gun that has its required markings removed or by having a real gun that is made up to look like a toy.I've got a crazy idea. Rather than criminalizing the toyification (I just made that up!) of a gun or the detoyification (see!) of a toy gun, why not just punish the damn criminals? I mean, I know holding people responsible for their actions is so last century and all, but by turning the focus to the piece of plastic being used (or the toy) instead of the person wielding it, we're taking the responsibility away from the criminal yet again - it's not their fault, it's that darn plastic toy!
State Senate Republican Rick Jones said that this has become a major problem, especially within the gang community. “People are taking imitation firearms that look real, cutting off the orange end and then threatening people,” he said.
The incredibly faulty logic here is that children have been shot by police officers who mistook the toy guns for real, so all toy firearms should have certain features defining them as toys. The problem with this, of course, is that you have cases where wallets, cell phones, etc. are also mistaken for guns - because it's the action of the person confronting the police rather than the object being held.
But yeah, make it a crime to have a toy gun without markings - that'll stop criminals alright!
That is all.
3 comments:
Detroit. The Place where the State is about to assume Control, and Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are threatening to cause Hate and Discontent because such a move is Racist!
So, a criminal brandishes a fake weapon at a policeman and dies as a result.
And you want to prevent this?
The perp would have brandished a real weapon if he had it. Since he didn't, I suspect the shortage was as much in the thinking-ahead department as it was in the can't-find-a-real-gun department.
And if that's the case, will he think ahead further if we write another law?
Ooh, I hadn't thought about the "thwarting Darwin" aspect...
Post a Comment